Comment se questionnent les pratiques d’injection ? Retours méthodologiques de terrain

Iris Condamine-Ducreux, M. Jauffret-Roustide
{"title":"Comment se questionnent les pratiques d’injection ? Retours méthodologiques de terrain","authors":"Iris Condamine-Ducreux, M. Jauffret-Roustide","doi":"10.1177/07591063221103374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do we question injection practices ? Methodological feedback from the field. This article takes a reflective look at the collection and production of quantitative data from so-called “hidden” and hard-to-reach populations concerning intravenous drug use. It is based on observations of 152 questionnaires administered during the multidisciplinary RESEAU study. It discusses some of the difficulties encountered by the field investigator in establishing and developing a relationship of trust with the respondent, despite the obligatory mediation of professionals in order to establish contact. It also presents the difficulties of positioning the interviewer’s discourse, in tension between distance and advice. This article also exposes the existence of a gap between the technical explanation of practices and the intimate experience of users. Finally, it highlights the difficulties of managing ‘sensitive’ questions and conflicts in the survey relationship. This feedback from qualitative fieldwork within a quantitative questionnaire method highlights the complementarity of these methods and the benefits of their use.","PeriodicalId":210053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063221103374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do we question injection practices ? Methodological feedback from the field. This article takes a reflective look at the collection and production of quantitative data from so-called “hidden” and hard-to-reach populations concerning intravenous drug use. It is based on observations of 152 questionnaires administered during the multidisciplinary RESEAU study. It discusses some of the difficulties encountered by the field investigator in establishing and developing a relationship of trust with the respondent, despite the obligatory mediation of professionals in order to establish contact. It also presents the difficulties of positioning the interviewer’s discourse, in tension between distance and advice. This article also exposes the existence of a gap between the technical explanation of practices and the intimate experience of users. Finally, it highlights the difficulties of managing ‘sensitive’ questions and conflicts in the survey relationship. This feedback from qualitative fieldwork within a quantitative questionnaire method highlights the complementarity of these methods and the benefits of their use.
注射实践是如何受到质疑的?实地的方法学反馈
我们如何质疑注射实践?来自实地的方法反馈。本文对从所谓的“隐藏”和难以接触到的人群中收集和生产有关静脉注射药物使用的定量数据进行了反思。它是基于在多学科RESEAU研究期间进行的152份问卷的观察。它讨论了实地调查员在与被调查者建立和发展信任关系方面遇到的一些困难,尽管为了建立联系必须由专业人员进行调解。在距离和建议之间的紧张关系中,它也表现出了定位面试官话语的困难。本文还揭示了实践的技术解释与用户的亲密体验之间存在的差距。最后,它强调了在调查关系中管理“敏感”问题和冲突的困难。定量问卷调查方法中定性实地调查的反馈突出了这些方法的互补性和使用它们的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信