{"title":"Regulations concerning individual risk and public safety","authors":"D. Katritsis, Mark A. Anderson, M. Webb-peploe","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198784906.003.0758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulations and guidelines with recommendations on driving and flying following a major cardiac event or cardiac intervention, or both, have been published by national and international cardiology societies, including the European Society of Cardiology. However, most of them are mainly based on consensus of opinion of experts and/or small studies and registries, and become outdated in the light of emerging new evidence. What constitutes an acceptable risk cannot always be answered by scientific evidence and may have to be a matter of consensus. The balance between individual freedom and protection of the public is not easily achieved and requires ongoing review and update.","PeriodicalId":339880,"journal":{"name":"ESC CardioMed","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC CardioMed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198784906.003.0758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Regulations and guidelines with recommendations on driving and flying following a major cardiac event or cardiac intervention, or both, have been published by national and international cardiology societies, including the European Society of Cardiology. However, most of them are mainly based on consensus of opinion of experts and/or small studies and registries, and become outdated in the light of emerging new evidence. What constitutes an acceptable risk cannot always be answered by scientific evidence and may have to be a matter of consensus. The balance between individual freedom and protection of the public is not easily achieved and requires ongoing review and update.
包括欧洲心脏病学会(European Society of cardiology)在内的国家和国际心脏病学会已经发布了关于重大心脏病事件或心脏干预(或两者兼而有之)后驾驶和飞行的建议的法规和指南。然而,其中大多数主要是基于专家意见的共识和/或小型研究和登记,并在出现新证据的情况下变得过时。什么构成可接受的风险并不总是有科学证据来回答,可能必须是一个共识问题。在个人自由和保护公众之间取得平衡并不容易,需要不断审查和更新。