Regulations concerning individual risk and public safety

D. Katritsis, Mark A. Anderson, M. Webb-peploe
{"title":"Regulations concerning individual risk and public safety","authors":"D. Katritsis, Mark A. Anderson, M. Webb-peploe","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198784906.003.0758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulations and guidelines with recommendations on driving and flying following a major cardiac event or cardiac intervention, or both, have been published by national and international cardiology societies, including the European Society of Cardiology. However, most of them are mainly based on consensus of opinion of experts and/or small studies and registries, and become outdated in the light of emerging new evidence. What constitutes an acceptable risk cannot always be answered by scientific evidence and may have to be a matter of consensus. The balance between individual freedom and protection of the public is not easily achieved and requires ongoing review and update.","PeriodicalId":339880,"journal":{"name":"ESC CardioMed","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC CardioMed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198784906.003.0758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Regulations and guidelines with recommendations on driving and flying following a major cardiac event or cardiac intervention, or both, have been published by national and international cardiology societies, including the European Society of Cardiology. However, most of them are mainly based on consensus of opinion of experts and/or small studies and registries, and become outdated in the light of emerging new evidence. What constitutes an acceptable risk cannot always be answered by scientific evidence and may have to be a matter of consensus. The balance between individual freedom and protection of the public is not easily achieved and requires ongoing review and update.
关于个人风险和公共安全的规定
包括欧洲心脏病学会(European Society of cardiology)在内的国家和国际心脏病学会已经发布了关于重大心脏病事件或心脏干预(或两者兼而有之)后驾驶和飞行的建议的法规和指南。然而,其中大多数主要是基于专家意见的共识和/或小型研究和登记,并在出现新证据的情况下变得过时。什么构成可接受的风险并不总是有科学证据来回答,可能必须是一个共识问题。在个人自由和保护公众之间取得平衡并不容易,需要不断审查和更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信