A Complete Comparison on Pure and Cued Recall-Based Graphical User Authentication Algorithms

Arash Habibi Lashkari, Rosli Saleh, Farnaz Towhidi, Samaneh Farmand
{"title":"A Complete Comparison on Pure and Cued Recall-Based Graphical User Authentication Algorithms","authors":"Arash Habibi Lashkari, Rosli Saleh, Farnaz Towhidi, Samaneh Farmand","doi":"10.1109/ICCEE.2009.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, user authentication is one of the important topics in information security. Strong text-based password schemes could provide with certain degree of security. However, the fact that strong passwords are difficult to memorize often leads their owners to write them down on papers or even save them in a computer file. Graphical authentication has been proposed as a possible alternative solution to text-based authentication, motivated particularly by the fact that humans can remember images better than text. In recent years, many networks, computer systems and Internet-based environments try used graphical authentication technique for their user’s authentication. All of graphical passwords have two different aspects which are usability and security. Unfortunately none of these algorithms were being able to cover both of these aspects at the same time. During our research, we could find eleven Recall-Based authentication algorithms which we tried to explain their lacks and attacks. Then in the last section, in order to cover usability and security features at the same time, we try to make three different comparison tables.","PeriodicalId":343870,"journal":{"name":"2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering","volume":"28 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Second International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEE.2009.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Nowadays, user authentication is one of the important topics in information security. Strong text-based password schemes could provide with certain degree of security. However, the fact that strong passwords are difficult to memorize often leads their owners to write them down on papers or even save them in a computer file. Graphical authentication has been proposed as a possible alternative solution to text-based authentication, motivated particularly by the fact that humans can remember images better than text. In recent years, many networks, computer systems and Internet-based environments try used graphical authentication technique for their user’s authentication. All of graphical passwords have two different aspects which are usability and security. Unfortunately none of these algorithms were being able to cover both of these aspects at the same time. During our research, we could find eleven Recall-Based authentication algorithms which we tried to explain their lacks and attacks. Then in the last section, in order to cover usability and security features at the same time, we try to make three different comparison tables.
纯和基于提示回忆的图形用户认证算法的完整比较
当前,用户认证是信息安全领域的重要课题之一。基于文本的强密码方案可以提供一定程度的安全性。然而,强密码难以记忆的事实往往导致其所有者将其写在纸上,甚至保存在计算机文件中。图形身份验证已被提议作为基于文本身份验证的一种可能的替代解决方案,特别是由于人类比文本更能记住图像这一事实。近年来,许多网络、计算机系统和基于internet的环境都尝试使用图形认证技术对用户进行认证。所有的图形密码都有两个不同的方面,可用性和安全性。不幸的是,这些算法都无法同时涵盖这两个方面。在我们的研究中,我们发现了11种基于回忆的认证算法,我们试图解释它们的不足和攻击。然后在最后一节,为了同时涵盖可用性和安全性特性,我们尝试制作三种不同的比较表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信