DAMPAK PERSONALISASI PARTAI TERHADAP DEMOKRASI INTERNAL PARTAI DI INDONESIA PASCA ORDE BARU

Esty Ekawati, M. K. Sweinstani
{"title":"DAMPAK PERSONALISASI PARTAI TERHADAP DEMOKRASI INTERNAL PARTAI DI INDONESIA PASCA ORDE BARU","authors":"Esty Ekawati, M. K. Sweinstani","doi":"10.24198/jwp.v5i2.28850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"politik pendek. Personalisasi politik tidak dikompromikan karena fenomena tersebut berdampak bangunan partai politik ABSTRACT. Political parties are one of the important instruments in building democracy. However, when political parties are demanded to be modern parties that carry out their activities legally and rationally, in the reform era, parties have fallen into various problems, one of which is the problem of personalizing political parties. By using qualitative explanatory methods that try to the phenomenon of political personalization in the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, the Gerindra Party, and the Nasdem Party, it is known that factors caused the party personification are the charisma of certain person, patron-client culture, and economic motive. Although some previous studies have stated that personalizing political parties under certain conditions favors parties to maintain party solidity, the study found that these positive impacts were only apparent and short-term impacts. Personalization of political parties cannot be tolerated and compromised because the phenomenon has an impact on the building of political parties that are built from a system of dependence on certain figures who can play a holistic role for their parties. Furthermore, this condition threatens the party’s internal democracy which makes the institutionalization of political parties hampered, the death of party’s internal democracy, to the adverse impact on the elite circulation.","PeriodicalId":325644,"journal":{"name":"JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v5i2.28850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

politik pendek. Personalisasi politik tidak dikompromikan karena fenomena tersebut berdampak bangunan partai politik ABSTRACT. Political parties are one of the important instruments in building democracy. However, when political parties are demanded to be modern parties that carry out their activities legally and rationally, in the reform era, parties have fallen into various problems, one of which is the problem of personalizing political parties. By using qualitative explanatory methods that try to the phenomenon of political personalization in the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, the Gerindra Party, and the Nasdem Party, it is known that factors caused the party personification are the charisma of certain person, patron-client culture, and economic motive. Although some previous studies have stated that personalizing political parties under certain conditions favors parties to maintain party solidity, the study found that these positive impacts were only apparent and short-term impacts. Personalization of political parties cannot be tolerated and compromised because the phenomenon has an impact on the building of political parties that are built from a system of dependence on certain figures who can play a holistic role for their parties. Furthermore, this condition threatens the party’s internal democracy which makes the institutionalization of political parties hampered, the death of party’s internal democracy, to the adverse impact on the elite circulation.
新秩序后,该党对印尼党内民主的个性化影响
政治pendek。个人主义政治与社会主义政治是两极化的关系,政治与社会主义政治是两极化的关系。政党是民主建设的重要工具之一。然而,在要求政党成为合法、合理地开展活动的现代政党的同时,在改革时代,政党陷入了各种问题,其中之一就是政党人格化问题。运用定性解释的方法,对印尼斗争民主党、格林德拉党、民族民主党的政治人格化现象进行了分析,发现造成政党人格化的因素主要有个人魅力、庇护文化、经济动机等。虽然之前的一些研究表明,在某些条件下,政党个性化有利于政党保持政党的稳固性,但研究发现,这些积极影响只是明显的和短期的影响。政党的人格化是不能容忍和妥协的,因为这种现象对政党的建设产生了影响,政党的建设是建立在依赖某些能够为其政党发挥整体作用的人物的制度之上的。进而,这种状况对党内民主构成威胁,使政党制度化受到阻碍,党内民主死亡,对精英阶层的流动产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信