Impact of Flexibility Services Implementation on Power Network Constraint Management

C. Cruzat, S. Karim Anaya, M. Pollitt, Rhys Williams
{"title":"Impact of Flexibility Services Implementation on Power Network Constraint Management","authors":"C. Cruzat, S. Karim Anaya, M. Pollitt, Rhys Williams","doi":"10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9842934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread deployment of flexibility services e.g. by generators, energy storage units and demand response, are causing novel challenges to Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) or Distribution System Operators (DSOs) when managing their power systems. The aim of this research is to understand the economic impact that these flexibility services could cause on possible future world scenarios. This paper presents the main findings obtained from the MERLIN project, which explores and compares the techno-economic impact of managing network operational constraints through traditional reinforcement and flexibility services over a ten-year forecast period. Two case studies were carried out, the realistic case (RC), which focusess on realistic load and generation forecasts, and the worst-case (WC), which is what is traditionally performed by DNO system planners to model the impact of peak demand when generation is turned off over a period of time. The analysis was conducted on the 33/11 kV network in Fort William, (Western Scottish Highlands). The study revealed insights into the anticipated costs of traditional reinforcement and influenced when flexibility services would be a more favorable investment option. Results suggest that flexibility services are preferred only to deal with thermal constraints in the 33 kV line, with no or negligible savings in the 11 kV line. The results show discounted savings of around £175k for four year deferral (by 2050), equivalent to 12% of reinforcement costs.","PeriodicalId":303656,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9842934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread deployment of flexibility services e.g. by generators, energy storage units and demand response, are causing novel challenges to Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) or Distribution System Operators (DSOs) when managing their power systems. The aim of this research is to understand the economic impact that these flexibility services could cause on possible future world scenarios. This paper presents the main findings obtained from the MERLIN project, which explores and compares the techno-economic impact of managing network operational constraints through traditional reinforcement and flexibility services over a ten-year forecast period. Two case studies were carried out, the realistic case (RC), which focusess on realistic load and generation forecasts, and the worst-case (WC), which is what is traditionally performed by DNO system planners to model the impact of peak demand when generation is turned off over a period of time. The analysis was conducted on the 33/11 kV network in Fort William, (Western Scottish Highlands). The study revealed insights into the anticipated costs of traditional reinforcement and influenced when flexibility services would be a more favorable investment option. Results suggest that flexibility services are preferred only to deal with thermal constraints in the 33 kV line, with no or negligible savings in the 11 kV line. The results show discounted savings of around £175k for four year deferral (by 2050), equivalent to 12% of reinforcement costs.
柔性服务实施对电网约束管理的影响
发电机、储能单元和需求响应等灵活性服务的广泛部署,给配电网络运营商(DNOs)或配电系统运营商(dso)在管理其电力系统时带来了新的挑战。这项研究的目的是了解这些灵活性服务可能对未来世界可能造成的经济影响。本文介绍了从MERLIN项目中获得的主要发现,该项目探索并比较了在十年预测期内通过传统强化和灵活性服务管理网络运营约束的技术经济影响。我们进行了两个案例研究,一个是现实案例(RC),重点关注现实负荷和发电量预测,另一个是最坏情况(WC),这是DNO系统规划人员传统上执行的,用于模拟在一段时间内关闭发电时峰值需求的影响。分析是在Fort William(西苏格兰高地)的33/11 kV网络上进行的。该研究揭示了传统加固的预期成本,并影响了灵活性服务何时成为更有利的投资选择。结果表明,灵活性服务只适用于处理33kv线路的热约束,而在11kv线路中没有或可以忽略不计。结果显示,四年延期(到2050年)可节省约17.5万英镑,相当于加固成本的12%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信