Cultural Effects on Leadership: A Study of Dispositional Resilience in Societies

Shawn G. Sejera
{"title":"Cultural Effects on Leadership: A Study of Dispositional Resilience in Societies","authors":"Shawn G. Sejera","doi":"10.9734/bpi/mpebm/v5/3316f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An study of dispositional resilience in cultures and its relationship to leader effectiveness is provided, beginning with an introduction to the study's research problem, research question, dispositional resilience theory, different dimensions of culture and society, theoretical foundations of the variables through a definition of terms, literature review, a discussion of research methods and instrumentation, future analysis implications, and a conclusion. The objective of this study intended to refine and further the understanding of dispositional resilience as it relates to leadership in different and disparate cultures. Specifically, this study sought to empirically measure the levels and determine the relationship of dispositional resilience in Latin American, Latin European, and Confucian country clusters. The study looked at the degrees of dispositional resilience traits in different cultures and how those traits affect leader performance. The data was analysed after a review of four studies, three of which looked into the impact of dispositional resilience on practitioner performance and stress levels. The Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS) was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring individual dispositional resilience (hardiness and resilience), and the GLOBE Study was found to be a viable and reliable framework for examining different cultures. The study found a statistically significant difference between Confucian country cluster students and Latin American and Latin European country cluster students using the One-Way ANOVA technique. Future research implications are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":289581,"journal":{"name":"Modern Perspectives in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 5","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Perspectives in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 5","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mpebm/v5/3316f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An study of dispositional resilience in cultures and its relationship to leader effectiveness is provided, beginning with an introduction to the study's research problem, research question, dispositional resilience theory, different dimensions of culture and society, theoretical foundations of the variables through a definition of terms, literature review, a discussion of research methods and instrumentation, future analysis implications, and a conclusion. The objective of this study intended to refine and further the understanding of dispositional resilience as it relates to leadership in different and disparate cultures. Specifically, this study sought to empirically measure the levels and determine the relationship of dispositional resilience in Latin American, Latin European, and Confucian country clusters. The study looked at the degrees of dispositional resilience traits in different cultures and how those traits affect leader performance. The data was analysed after a review of four studies, three of which looked into the impact of dispositional resilience on practitioner performance and stress levels. The Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS) was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring individual dispositional resilience (hardiness and resilience), and the GLOBE Study was found to be a viable and reliable framework for examining different cultures. The study found a statistically significant difference between Confucian country cluster students and Latin American and Latin European country cluster students using the One-Way ANOVA technique. Future research implications are highlighted.
文化对领导力的影响:社会气质弹性的研究
本文首先介绍了本研究的研究问题、研究问题、性格弹性理论、文化与社会的不同维度、变量的理论基础(通过术语的定义)、文献综述、研究方法和工具的讨论、未来分析的意义以及结论。本研究的目的是完善和进一步理解性格弹性,因为它与不同和不同文化中的领导力有关。具体而言,本研究试图通过实证测量拉丁美洲、拉丁欧洲和儒家国家集群的心理弹性水平并确定其关系。该研究考察了不同文化中性格韧性特征的程度,以及这些特征如何影响领导者的表现。这些数据是在回顾了四项研究后进行分析的,其中三项研究调查了性格弹性对从业者表现和压力水平的影响。气质弹性量表(DRS)是衡量个体气质弹性(适应力和适应力)的有效和可靠的工具,GLOBE研究是检验不同文化的可行和可靠的框架。研究发现,使用单因素方差分析技术,儒家国家群学生与拉丁美洲和拉丁欧洲国家群学生之间存在统计学上的显著差异。强调了未来的研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信