Udvidende fortolkning eller analogi – straffelovens § 1

Lars Bo Langsted
{"title":"Udvidende fortolkning eller analogi – straffelovens § 1","authors":"Lars Bo Langsted","doi":"10.7146/ntfk.v109i3.134401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains a clarification of the difference between »expanded interpretation« and »analogy« in criminal law. Doubt about the terms is raised by newer Danish literature stating that expanded interpretation is similar to analogy. In the article it is argued that a large difference exists between the two terms and that it is a slippery road in the context of legal rights to let analogy be included in the term expanded interpretation.","PeriodicalId":351350,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/ntfk.v109i3.134401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contains a clarification of the difference between »expanded interpretation« and »analogy« in criminal law. Doubt about the terms is raised by newer Danish literature stating that expanded interpretation is similar to analogy. In the article it is argued that a large difference exists between the two terms and that it is a slippery road in the context of legal rights to let analogy be included in the term expanded interpretation.
本文对刑法中“扩展解释”与“类比”的区别进行了澄清。对这些术语的怀疑是由较新的丹麦文献提出的,它们认为扩展解释类似于类比。本文认为,这两个术语之间存在着很大的差异,在法律权利的背景下,将类比纳入术语的扩展解释是一条曲折的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信