Optimal Scheduling of Models and Horizons for Model Hierarchy Predictive Control

C. Khazoom, Steve Heim, Daniel Gonzalez-Diaz, Sangbae Kim
{"title":"Optimal Scheduling of Models and Horizons for Model Hierarchy Predictive Control","authors":"C. Khazoom, Steve Heim, Daniel Gonzalez-Diaz, Sangbae Kim","doi":"10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model predictive control (MPC) is a powerful tool to control systems with non-linear dynamics and constraints, but its computational demands impose limitations on the dynamics model used for planning. Instead of using a single complex model along the MPC horizon, model hierarchy predictive control (MHPC) reduces solve times by planning over a sequence of models of varying complexity within a single horizon. Choosing this model sequence can become intractable when considering all possible combinations of reduced order models and prediction horizons. We propose a framework to systematically optimize a model schedule for MHPC. We leverage trajectory optimization (TO) to approximate the accumulated cost of the closed-loop controller. We trade off performance and solve times by minimizing the number of decision variables of the MHPC problem along the horizon while keeping the approximate closed-loop cost near optimal. The framework is validated in simulation with a planar humanoid robot as a proof of concept. We find that the approximated closed-loop cost matches the simulated one for most of the model schedules, and show that the proposed approach finds optimal model schedules that transfer directly to simulation, and with total horizons that vary between 1.1 and 1.6 walking steps.","PeriodicalId":360533,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Model predictive control (MPC) is a powerful tool to control systems with non-linear dynamics and constraints, but its computational demands impose limitations on the dynamics model used for planning. Instead of using a single complex model along the MPC horizon, model hierarchy predictive control (MHPC) reduces solve times by planning over a sequence of models of varying complexity within a single horizon. Choosing this model sequence can become intractable when considering all possible combinations of reduced order models and prediction horizons. We propose a framework to systematically optimize a model schedule for MHPC. We leverage trajectory optimization (TO) to approximate the accumulated cost of the closed-loop controller. We trade off performance and solve times by minimizing the number of decision variables of the MHPC problem along the horizon while keeping the approximate closed-loop cost near optimal. The framework is validated in simulation with a planar humanoid robot as a proof of concept. We find that the approximated closed-loop cost matches the simulated one for most of the model schedules, and show that the proposed approach finds optimal model schedules that transfer directly to simulation, and with total horizons that vary between 1.1 and 1.6 walking steps.
模型层次预测控制的模型最优调度与视野
模型预测控制(MPC)是控制具有非线性动力学和约束的系统的有力工具,但其计算需求对用于规划的动力学模型施加了限制。模型层次预测控制(MHPC)不再使用MPC水平上的单个复杂模型,而是通过在单个水平上规划一系列不同复杂性的模型来减少求解时间。当考虑到所有可能的降阶模型和预测范围的组合时,选择这个模型序列会变得棘手。我们提出了一个框架来系统地优化MHPC的模型进度。我们利用轨迹优化(TO)来近似闭环控制器的累积成本。我们通过最小化MHPC问题的决策变量数量来权衡性能和求解时间,同时保持近似闭环成本接近最优。通过一个平面人形机器人的仿真验证了该框架的概念验证。我们发现,对于大多数模型调度,近似闭环成本与模拟成本相匹配,并且表明所提出的方法找到了直接转移到仿真的最优模型调度,并且总步数在1.1 ~ 1.6步之间变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信