{"title":"Regulasi Kejahatan Cyber Sebagai Upaya Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Cybersquatting","authors":"Dewi Muti’ah, Firda Laily Mufid","doi":"10.33319/yume.v8i1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract—It’s undeniable that the emergence of the internet is like a double-edged sword, on the one hand it has a positive impact and on the other it has a negative impact. The positive impact of the internet is that we can get various information around the world easily. Misuse of domain names has led to a new crime in the cyber world, namely cybersquatting. Criminals take advantage of well-known domain names by making duplicates of those domain names which then register them for resale to other parties at a higher price. This article uses normative legal research, meaning that the issues raised, discussed and described in this research are focused on applying the rules or norms in positive law. This type of normative juridical research is carried out by examining various kinds of formal legal rules such as laws, literatures that are theoretical concepts which are then related to the problems that are the subject of discussion. The results obtained from writing this article are that regulations regarding cyber regulation in Indonesia are not only regulated in KUHP but also regulated in Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik and that regulations regarding cyber in Indonesia have not yet reached cybersquatting crime.. The current ITE Law is in fact still unable to realize criminal responsibility for cybersquatting perpetrators. \n ","PeriodicalId":339930,"journal":{"name":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract—It’s undeniable that the emergence of the internet is like a double-edged sword, on the one hand it has a positive impact and on the other it has a negative impact. The positive impact of the internet is that we can get various information around the world easily. Misuse of domain names has led to a new crime in the cyber world, namely cybersquatting. Criminals take advantage of well-known domain names by making duplicates of those domain names which then register them for resale to other parties at a higher price. This article uses normative legal research, meaning that the issues raised, discussed and described in this research are focused on applying the rules or norms in positive law. This type of normative juridical research is carried out by examining various kinds of formal legal rules such as laws, literatures that are theoretical concepts which are then related to the problems that are the subject of discussion. The results obtained from writing this article are that regulations regarding cyber regulation in Indonesia are not only regulated in KUHP but also regulated in Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik and that regulations regarding cyber in Indonesia have not yet reached cybersquatting crime.. The current ITE Law is in fact still unable to realize criminal responsibility for cybersquatting perpetrators.
摘要:不可否认,互联网的出现就像一把双刃剑,一方面有积极的影响,另一方面也有消极的影响。互联网的积极影响是我们可以很容易地在世界各地获得各种信息。滥用域名已导致网络世界出现一种新的罪行,即域名抢注。犯罪分子利用知名域名,复制这些域名,然后注册,以更高的价格转售给其他人。本文使用规范法律研究,这意味着本研究中提出、讨论和描述的问题侧重于在成文法中应用规则或规范。这种类型的规范性法律研究是通过检查各种正式的法律规则来进行的,例如法律,作为理论概念的文献,然后与作为讨论主题的问题相关。撰写本文的结果是,印度尼西亚的网络监管法规不仅在KUHP受到监管,而且在Undang-undang Republik Indonesia也受到监管Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik,印度尼西亚的网络监管法规尚未达到域名squatting crime。现行的信息技术交易法实际上仍然无法实现对域名抢注行骗者的刑事责任。