Governing for Free: Rule Process Effects on Reddit Moderator Motivations

Han Wang, Beril Bulat, Stephen Fujimoto, Seth Frey
{"title":"Governing for Free: Rule Process Effects on Reddit Moderator Motivations","authors":"Han Wang, Beril Bulat, Stephen Fujimoto, Seth Frey","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2206.05629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing a strong community requires empowered leadership capable of overcoming governance challenges. New online platforms have given users opportunities to practice governance through content moderation roles. The over 2.8 million\"subreddit\"communities on Reddit are governed by hundreds of thousands of volunteer moderators, many of whom have no training or prior experience in a governing role. While moderators often devote daily time to community maintenance and cope with the emotional effects of hate comments or disturbing content, Reddit provides no compensation for this position. Thus, moderators' internal motivations and desire to continue filling this role is critical for their community. Drawing upon the relationship between governance procedures and internalized motivation, we investigate how the processes through which subreddit moderators generate community rules increase moderators' motivation through the meeting of social-psychological needs: Procedural Justice and Self Determination, and Self-Other Merging. Preliminary analysis of survey data from 620 moderators across Reddit shows a correlation between moderators' administrative behaviors and the social-psychological needs underpinning their motivations. Understanding these relationships will allow us to empower moderators to build engaging and cooperative online communities.","PeriodicalId":129626,"journal":{"name":"Interacción","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interacción","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.05629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Developing a strong community requires empowered leadership capable of overcoming governance challenges. New online platforms have given users opportunities to practice governance through content moderation roles. The over 2.8 million"subreddit"communities on Reddit are governed by hundreds of thousands of volunteer moderators, many of whom have no training or prior experience in a governing role. While moderators often devote daily time to community maintenance and cope with the emotional effects of hate comments or disturbing content, Reddit provides no compensation for this position. Thus, moderators' internal motivations and desire to continue filling this role is critical for their community. Drawing upon the relationship between governance procedures and internalized motivation, we investigate how the processes through which subreddit moderators generate community rules increase moderators' motivation through the meeting of social-psychological needs: Procedural Justice and Self Determination, and Self-Other Merging. Preliminary analysis of survey data from 620 moderators across Reddit shows a correlation between moderators' administrative behaviors and the social-psychological needs underpinning their motivations. Understanding these relationships will allow us to empower moderators to build engaging and cooperative online communities.
免费管理:规则流程对Reddit版主动机的影响
发展一个强大的社区需要有能力克服治理挑战的授权领导。新的在线平台为用户提供了通过内容审核角色实践治理的机会。Reddit上超过280万个“subreddit”社区由成千上万的志愿版主管理,其中许多人没有接受过管理角色的培训或之前的经验。虽然版主通常每天都花时间维护社区,处理仇恨评论或令人不安的内容带来的情绪影响,但Reddit对这一职位不提供任何补偿。因此,版主的内部动机和继续扮演这一角色的愿望对他们的社区至关重要。基于治理程序与内化动机之间的关系,我们研究了subreddit版主生成社区规则的过程如何通过满足社会心理需求来增加版主的动机:程序正义和自我决定,以及自我-他人融合。对Reddit上620名版主的调查数据进行的初步分析显示,版主的行政行为与支撑其动机的社会心理需求之间存在相关性。了解这些关系将使我们能够授权版主建立参与和合作的在线社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信