Peak gain and directivity estimation accuracy from pattern measurement

Maryam Razmhosseini, R. Vaughan
{"title":"Peak gain and directivity estimation accuracy from pattern measurement","authors":"Maryam Razmhosseini, R. Vaughan","doi":"10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comparison between different near-field measurement techniques for antenna gain and directivity estimations. Several gain measurement techniques exist including comparison gain and direct gain, which have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy, cost and measurement time. In this study, the comparison gain technique is used. In addition, three different near-field measurement methods including planar, cylindrical and spherical have been compared for antenna gain and directivity estimation.","PeriodicalId":447985,"journal":{"name":"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 17th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTEM.2016.7550168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper provides a comparison between different near-field measurement techniques for antenna gain and directivity estimations. Several gain measurement techniques exist including comparison gain and direct gain, which have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of accuracy, cost and measurement time. In this study, the comparison gain technique is used. In addition, three different near-field measurement methods including planar, cylindrical and spherical have been compared for antenna gain and directivity estimation.
从方向图测量得到的峰值增益和指向性估计精度
本文对天线增益和指向性估计的不同近场测量技术进行了比较。目前存在的几种增益测量技术,包括比较增益和直接增益,在精度、成本和测量时间等方面各有优缺点。在本研究中,采用了比较增益技术。此外,还比较了平面、圆柱和球面三种近场测量方法对天线增益和指向性的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信