The essay and psychogeography: Negotiating Marxism in the essays of Iain Sinclair and Will Self

W. Brown
{"title":"The essay and psychogeography: Negotiating Marxism in the essays of Iain Sinclair and Will Self","authors":"W. Brown","doi":"10.1386/aps_00007_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In their essays for the London Review of Books (LRB), Iain Sinclair and Will Self draw on two legacies in particular ‐ that of the essays of Walter Benjamin and Theodor Adorno, and that of Psychogeography and the work of the Situationist International.\n This article reviews a selection of these LRB essays ‐ appearing between 2002 and 2015. It traces and analyses a dialectical tension within them ‐ inherited from Benjamin and Adorno ‐ as to the commensurability of 'the essayistic' with the delivery of serious, effective\n Marxist criticism; whether (as Self himself says, noting an analogous tension in the films of Patrick Keiller) they are to see their own work 'as part of a strategy of resistance to the spatial forms of late capitalism, or only as incorporations of the everyday into a bourgeois calculus of\n the arty-factual'. It is argued that this tension is itself not only characteristic of, but in some way fundamental to their work and its impetus, concluding with a consideration of how the essay form might offer a means of moving beyond ideology (which is the constraint of both capitalism\n and Marxism alike) ‐ to find a literary analogue to, and vehicle for, the imaginative spatial possibilities and practices that the psychogeographic legacy represents.","PeriodicalId":311280,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00007_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In their essays for the London Review of Books (LRB), Iain Sinclair and Will Self draw on two legacies in particular ‐ that of the essays of Walter Benjamin and Theodor Adorno, and that of Psychogeography and the work of the Situationist International. This article reviews a selection of these LRB essays ‐ appearing between 2002 and 2015. It traces and analyses a dialectical tension within them ‐ inherited from Benjamin and Adorno ‐ as to the commensurability of 'the essayistic' with the delivery of serious, effective Marxist criticism; whether (as Self himself says, noting an analogous tension in the films of Patrick Keiller) they are to see their own work 'as part of a strategy of resistance to the spatial forms of late capitalism, or only as incorporations of the everyday into a bourgeois calculus of the arty-factual'. It is argued that this tension is itself not only characteristic of, but in some way fundamental to their work and its impetus, concluding with a consideration of how the essay form might offer a means of moving beyond ideology (which is the constraint of both capitalism and Marxism alike) ‐ to find a literary analogue to, and vehicle for, the imaginative spatial possibilities and practices that the psychogeographic legacy represents.
随笔与心理地理学:辛克莱与赛尔夫随笔中的马克思主义谈判
在他们为《伦敦书评》(LRB)撰写的文章中,伊恩·辛克莱和威尔·赛尔夫特别借鉴了两种遗产——瓦尔特·本雅明和西奥多·阿多诺的文章,以及心理地理学和情境主义国际的作品。本文回顾了2002年至2015年间出现的LRB文章。它追踪并分析了他们内部的辩证张力——从本雅明和阿多诺那里继承而来——以及“散文论”与严肃、有效的马克思主义批评的通约性;无论是(正如Self自己所说,在Patrick Keiller的电影中注意到类似的张力)他们将自己的作品视为“抵抗晚期资本主义空间形式的策略的一部分,还是仅仅将日常生活纳入资产阶级对艺术-事实的计算”。有人认为,这种张力本身不仅是他们作品的特征,而且在某种程度上是他们作品及其推动力的基础,最后考虑了散文形式如何提供一种超越意识形态(这是资本主义和马克思主义的约束)的手段——找到一种文学类比,以及为心理地理学遗产所代表的富有想象力的空间可能性和实践提供载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信