Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Disc Heights Change in Conservatively Treated Lumbar Herniated Disc Patients

D.-M. Seo, Yongjae Cho, Na Yang
{"title":"Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Disc Heights Change in Conservatively Treated Lumbar Herniated Disc Patients","authors":"D.-M. Seo, Yongjae Cho, Na Yang","doi":"10.21129/nerve.2021.7.2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic factors of disc height loss in spontaneous resolution of herniated lumbar disc patients.Methods: From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 56 symptomatic herniated lumbar disc patients (36 men and 20 women) were investigated retrospectively in this study. Clinical findings including age, sex, pain, and smoking history were examined in each group (group A, patients with not-changed disc heights; group B, patients with decreased disc heights). Radiologically, the level, severity, laterality, modic change, and disc degeneration of lumbar disc herniation were investigated between groups. We compared demographic and radiologic findings between groups.Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled (group A, 30 patients; group B, 26 patients). There were no significant statistical differences in age, sex, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, level of disc herniation, and laterality of disc herniation between groups. Group A had more protrusion cases (14/30 cases) and group B had more Sequestration (11/26 cases). About Modic change and disc degeneration classification, group B had more modic change cases and more disc degeneration cases than group B.Conclusion: In this study, there were no significant differences in demographic findings, level of disc herniation, the status of disc herniation, laterality of disc herniation, VAS of back pain between group A and group B.","PeriodicalId":229172,"journal":{"name":"The Nerve","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21129/nerve.2021.7.2.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic factors of disc height loss in spontaneous resolution of herniated lumbar disc patients.Methods: From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 56 symptomatic herniated lumbar disc patients (36 men and 20 women) were investigated retrospectively in this study. Clinical findings including age, sex, pain, and smoking history were examined in each group (group A, patients with not-changed disc heights; group B, patients with decreased disc heights). Radiologically, the level, severity, laterality, modic change, and disc degeneration of lumbar disc herniation were investigated between groups. We compared demographic and radiologic findings between groups.Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled (group A, 30 patients; group B, 26 patients). There were no significant statistical differences in age, sex, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, level of disc herniation, and laterality of disc herniation between groups. Group A had more protrusion cases (14/30 cases) and group B had more Sequestration (11/26 cases). About Modic change and disc degeneration classification, group B had more modic change cases and more disc degeneration cases than group B.Conclusion: In this study, there were no significant differences in demographic findings, level of disc herniation, the status of disc herniation, laterality of disc herniation, VAS of back pain between group A and group B.
保守治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘高度变化的临床和放射学分析
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估腰椎间盘突出症患者自发消退时椎间盘高度下降的临床和放射学因素。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月56例有症状的腰椎间盘突出症患者(男36例,女20例)的临床资料。每组的临床表现包括年龄、性别、疼痛和吸烟史(A组,椎间盘高度未改变的患者;B组为椎间盘高度降低的患者)。影像学上观察两组腰椎间盘突出症的程度、严重程度、侧边性、形态改变和椎间盘退变。我们比较了组间的人口学和放射学结果。结果:共纳入56例患者(A组,30例;B组26例)。两组患者在年龄、性别、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、椎间盘突出程度、椎间盘突出侧边度等方面均无统计学差异。A组突出较多(14/30),B组固支较多(11/26)。在椎间盘变型及退变分型方面,B组患者的变型及退变病例均多于B组。结论:本研究中,A组与B组患者在人口学特征、椎间盘突出程度、椎间盘突出状态、椎间盘突出侧边度、背痛VAS评分等方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信