Perencanaan Instalasi Penangkal Petir Pada Bangunan Industri Furniture

Sukamdi, Sri Wahyuni Dali, Chandra Wiharya, Abdu Alimil Asror
{"title":"Perencanaan Instalasi Penangkal Petir Pada Bangunan Industri Furniture","authors":"Sukamdi, Sri Wahyuni Dali, Chandra Wiharya, Abdu Alimil Asror","doi":"10.33795/elposys.v9i2.616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In planning external protection systems, the methods that are widely used are conventional and electrostatic lightning rod methods, therefore to study further, the results of observations that have been made to the industry there is still no lightning rod system so the author will try to plan and compare the plans of the two types of rods. lightning rods are Conventional ( Franklin ) and Electrostatic ( EF Lightning Protection System ) lightning rods in terms of protection, technical, economical, advantages and disadvantages. The research and observation methods were carried out in the furniture industry area of PT. Marufuji Kenzai Indonesia, with data collection techniques through direct observation, interviews, and literature studies, so that the building plan data (height, width and length of the building) are obtained and the 2020 thunder day data (IKL 238) then the data obtained is used to calculate the parameters in planning the installation of lightning rods according to the standards of SNI 03-7015-2004 and PUIPP. So that the results obtained for planning the conventional method ( Franklin ) with the placement of air terminations using the rolling ball method obtained 22 finials installed with buildings that can withstand currents of up to 160.1 kA and for the electrostatic method ( EF Lightning Protection System ) with 1 finial the building can withstand currents up to 25,891 kA, and if it exceeds this value a lightning rod will be caught.","PeriodicalId":308262,"journal":{"name":"ELPOSYS: Jurnal Sistem Kelistrikan","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELPOSYS: Jurnal Sistem Kelistrikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33795/elposys.v9i2.616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In planning external protection systems, the methods that are widely used are conventional and electrostatic lightning rod methods, therefore to study further, the results of observations that have been made to the industry there is still no lightning rod system so the author will try to plan and compare the plans of the two types of rods. lightning rods are Conventional ( Franklin ) and Electrostatic ( EF Lightning Protection System ) lightning rods in terms of protection, technical, economical, advantages and disadvantages. The research and observation methods were carried out in the furniture industry area of PT. Marufuji Kenzai Indonesia, with data collection techniques through direct observation, interviews, and literature studies, so that the building plan data (height, width and length of the building) are obtained and the 2020 thunder day data (IKL 238) then the data obtained is used to calculate the parameters in planning the installation of lightning rods according to the standards of SNI 03-7015-2004 and PUIPP. So that the results obtained for planning the conventional method ( Franklin ) with the placement of air terminations using the rolling ball method obtained 22 finials installed with buildings that can withstand currents of up to 160.1 kA and for the electrostatic method ( EF Lightning Protection System ) with 1 finial the building can withstand currents up to 25,891 kA, and if it exceeds this value a lightning rod will be caught.
计划在家具行业制造避雷针
在规划外部保护系统时,广泛使用的方法是常规避雷针方法和静电避雷针方法,因此为了进一步研究,根据对行业的观察结果,仍然没有避雷针系统,因此笔者将尝试规划和比较两种避雷针的方案。避雷针有常规(富兰克林)避雷针和静电(EF)避雷针两种,在防护、技术、经济、优缺点等方面都有区别。研究和观察方法在印尼Marufuji Kenzai公司的家具工业区域进行,采用直接观察、访谈、文献研究等数据收集技术,使建筑平面数据(高度、建筑物的宽度和长度)和2020年雷日数据(IKL 238),然后根据SNI 03-7015-2004和PUIPP标准计算避雷针规划安装参数。因此,规划使用滚动球法放置空气端子的传统方法(富兰克林)获得的结果是,安装了22个端子的建筑物可以承受高达160.1 kA的电流,对于静电方法(EF避雷系统),使用1个端子的建筑物可以承受高达25,891 kA的电流,如果超过这个值,避雷针将被捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信