StackOverflow and GitHub: Associations between Software Development and Crowdsourced Knowledge

Bogdan Vasilescu, V. Filkov, Alexander Serebrenik
{"title":"StackOverflow and GitHub: Associations between Software Development and Crowdsourced Knowledge","authors":"Bogdan Vasilescu, V. Filkov, Alexander Serebrenik","doi":"10.1109/SOCIALCOM.2013.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stack Overflow is a popular on-line programming question and answer community providing its participants with rapid access to knowledge and expertise of their peers, especially benefitting coders. Despite the popularity of Stack Overflow, its role in the work cycle of open-source developers is yet to be understood: on the one hand, participation in it has the potential to increase the knowledge of individual developers thus improving and speeding up the development process. On the other hand, participation in Stack Overflow may interrupt the regular working rhythm of the developer, hence also possibly slow down the development process. In this paper we investigate the interplay between Stack Overflow activities and the development process, reflected by code changes committed to the largest social coding repository, GitHub. Our study shows that active GitHub committers ask fewer questions and provide more answers than others. Moreover, we observe that active Stack Overflow askers distribute their work in a less uniform way than developers that do not ask questions. Finally, we show that despite the interruptions incurred, the Stack Overflow activity rate correlates with the code changing activity in GitHub.","PeriodicalId":129308,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"247","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCIALCOM.2013.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 247

Abstract

Stack Overflow is a popular on-line programming question and answer community providing its participants with rapid access to knowledge and expertise of their peers, especially benefitting coders. Despite the popularity of Stack Overflow, its role in the work cycle of open-source developers is yet to be understood: on the one hand, participation in it has the potential to increase the knowledge of individual developers thus improving and speeding up the development process. On the other hand, participation in Stack Overflow may interrupt the regular working rhythm of the developer, hence also possibly slow down the development process. In this paper we investigate the interplay between Stack Overflow activities and the development process, reflected by code changes committed to the largest social coding repository, GitHub. Our study shows that active GitHub committers ask fewer questions and provide more answers than others. Moreover, we observe that active Stack Overflow askers distribute their work in a less uniform way than developers that do not ask questions. Finally, we show that despite the interruptions incurred, the Stack Overflow activity rate correlates with the code changing activity in GitHub.
StackOverflow和GitHub:软件开发和众包知识之间的联系
Stack Overflow是一个流行的在线编程问答社区,它为参与者提供了快速访问同行的知识和专业知识的途径,特别是对编码人员有益。尽管Stack Overflow很受欢迎,但它在开源开发人员工作周期中的作用尚未被理解:一方面,参与它有可能增加个人开发人员的知识,从而改进和加快开发过程。另一方面,参与Stack Overflow可能会中断开发人员的正常工作节奏,因此也可能减慢开发过程。在本文中,我们研究了Stack Overflow活动与开发过程之间的相互作用,这反映在提交给最大的社交编码库GitHub的代码更改中。我们的研究表明,活跃的GitHub提交者比其他人提出的问题更少,提供的答案更多。此外,我们观察到活跃的Stack Overflow提问者比不提问的开发人员分配工作的方式更不统一。最后,我们表明,尽管发生了中断,Stack Overflow活动率与GitHub中的代码更改活动相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信