Cognition and Reality

F. Arecchi
{"title":"Cognition and Reality","authors":"F. Arecchi","doi":"10.13128/SUBSTANTIA-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss the two moments of human cognition, namely, apprehension (A), whereby a coherent perception emerges from the recruitment of neuronal groups, and judgment(B),that entails the comparison of two apprehensions acquired at different times, coded in a suitable language and retrieved by memory. (B) entails self-consciousness, in so far as the agent who expresses the judgment must be aware that the two apprehensions are submitted to his/her own scrutiny and that it is his/her task to extract a mutual relation. Since (B) lasts around 3 seconds, the semantic value of the pieces under comparison must be decided within that time. This implies a fast search of the memory contents. As a fact, exploring human subjects with sequences of simple words, we find evidence of a limited time window , corresponding to the memory retrieval of a linguistic item in order to match it with the next one in a text flow (be it literary, or musical,or figurative). While apprehension is globally explained as a Bayes inference, judgment tresults from an inverse Bayes inference. As a consequence, two hermeneutics emerge (called respectively circle and coil). The first one acts in a pre-assigned space of features. The second one provides the discovery of novel features, thus unveiling previously unknown aspects and hence representing the road to reality.","PeriodicalId":298664,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition","volume":"64 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"179","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13128/SUBSTANTIA-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 179

Abstract

We discuss the two moments of human cognition, namely, apprehension (A), whereby a coherent perception emerges from the recruitment of neuronal groups, and judgment(B),that entails the comparison of two apprehensions acquired at different times, coded in a suitable language and retrieved by memory. (B) entails self-consciousness, in so far as the agent who expresses the judgment must be aware that the two apprehensions are submitted to his/her own scrutiny and that it is his/her task to extract a mutual relation. Since (B) lasts around 3 seconds, the semantic value of the pieces under comparison must be decided within that time. This implies a fast search of the memory contents. As a fact, exploring human subjects with sequences of simple words, we find evidence of a limited time window , corresponding to the memory retrieval of a linguistic item in order to match it with the next one in a text flow (be it literary, or musical,or figurative). While apprehension is globally explained as a Bayes inference, judgment tresults from an inverse Bayes inference. As a consequence, two hermeneutics emerge (called respectively circle and coil). The first one acts in a pre-assigned space of features. The second one provides the discovery of novel features, thus unveiling previously unknown aspects and hence representing the road to reality.
认知与现实
我们讨论了人类认知的两个时刻,即理解(A)和判断(B),即从神经元群的招募中产生连贯的感知,这需要比较在不同时间获得的两种理解,用合适的语言编码并通过记忆检索。(B)需要自我意识,就表达判断的主体而言,他/她必须意识到,这两种忧虑都是由他/她自己审查的,提取一种相互关系是他/她的任务。由于(B)大约持续3秒,因此必须在这段时间内确定被比较片段的语义价值。这意味着对内存内容的快速搜索。事实上,在用简单的单词序列探索人类主题时,我们发现了有限时间窗口的证据,对应于一个语言项目的记忆检索,以便与文本流中的下一个项目相匹配(无论是文学、音乐还是比喻)。虽然忧虑在全局上被解释为贝叶斯推理,但判断是由反贝叶斯推理产生的。因此,出现了两种解释学(分别称为圆形和线圈)。第一个在预先分配的特征空间中起作用。第二个提供了新特征的发现,从而揭示了以前未知的方面,从而代表了通往现实的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信