School Heads’ Leadership Styles of Public Schools, Sub-Congressional District III, Bohol

Ronald L. Boniao, Maribeth Dusal Alpuerto, Elijah Lungay Sales
{"title":"School Heads’ Leadership Styles of Public Schools, Sub-Congressional District III, Bohol","authors":"Ronald L. Boniao, Maribeth Dusal Alpuerto, Elijah Lungay Sales","doi":"10.15631/ubmrj.v8i1.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research study aimed to identify the school heads' profiles and the association between the self-assessed and teacher-assessed school heads' leadership styles. It was tested on the 35 school heads and 315 public school teachers in the districts of Dimiao, Lila, Sevilla, Loboc, and Loay. It used a quantitative standardized survey instrument to determine the school heads' leadership styles. Findings revealed that school heads were mostly 41 to 60 years old, mainly female, mostly married, most had MA units, had Principal 1 designation, and had been in the service for 11 to 15 years. As assessed by the school heads themselves and the teachers, the majority of school leaders were going through a transition phase as to leadership styles, with a few using delegative and authoritarian styles, and none applying the participative style. Results revealed significant relationships between the self-assessed leadership styles and age and civil status, while statistically insignificant results in the relationship between the leadership styles and sex, educational attainment, designation, and length of service. As to the teacher-assessed leadership styles and the school heads' profile, the relationships were statistically insignificant. Furthermore, there was no association between the self-assessed and the teacher-assessed school heads' leadership styles.","PeriodicalId":399018,"journal":{"name":"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15631/ubmrj.v8i1.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research study aimed to identify the school heads' profiles and the association between the self-assessed and teacher-assessed school heads' leadership styles. It was tested on the 35 school heads and 315 public school teachers in the districts of Dimiao, Lila, Sevilla, Loboc, and Loay. It used a quantitative standardized survey instrument to determine the school heads' leadership styles. Findings revealed that school heads were mostly 41 to 60 years old, mainly female, mostly married, most had MA units, had Principal 1 designation, and had been in the service for 11 to 15 years. As assessed by the school heads themselves and the teachers, the majority of school leaders were going through a transition phase as to leadership styles, with a few using delegative and authoritarian styles, and none applying the participative style. Results revealed significant relationships between the self-assessed leadership styles and age and civil status, while statistically insignificant results in the relationship between the leadership styles and sex, educational attainment, designation, and length of service. As to the teacher-assessed leadership styles and the school heads' profile, the relationships were statistically insignificant. Furthermore, there was no association between the self-assessed and the teacher-assessed school heads' leadership styles.
公立学校校长的领导风格,国会第三区,薄荷岛
本研究的目的在于确定学校校长的概况,以及自评和教师评的学校校长领导风格之间的关联。在Dimiao、Lila、Sevilla、Loboc和Loay地区的35名校长和315名公立学校教师中进行了测试。它采用定量的标准化调查工具来确定学校校长的领导风格。调查结果显示,学校校长大多年龄介乎四十一至六十岁,以女性为主,大部分已婚,大部分拥有文学硕士学位,拥有一级校长职称,并已任职十一至十五年。根据校长本人和教师的评估,大多数学校领导正在经历领导风格的过渡阶段,少数人使用委托和专制风格,没有人使用参与式风格。结果显示,自评领导风格与年龄、公民身份有显著的关系,而与性别、学历、职称、服务年限的关系不显著。教师评价型领导风格与校长形象的关系不显著。此外,自评和教师评的校长领导风格之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信