Comparison of Photovoltaics System Response with Constant and Variable Step MPPT Algorithm

J. Nazdrowicz, W. Tylman, W. Marańda
{"title":"Comparison of Photovoltaics System Response with Constant and Variable Step MPPT Algorithm","authors":"J. Nazdrowicz, W. Tylman, W. Marańda","doi":"10.23919/mixdes55591.2022.9837976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basic foundation for obtaining maximum power is reaching the maximum operating point (Maximum Power Point), which makes it the highest possible power produced by the panel in the given solar and temperature conditions. Achieving this power requires adjusting the voltage in the work cycle, which unfortunately requires a kind of “search” by “sampling” the value of the instantaneous power at a given voltage. However, it takes a certain time to reach the maximum power, which implies power losses. One of the best known and quite simple MPPT algorithms is P&O (Perturb and Observation). Its operation, however, has a certain disadvantage related to the abrupt change of parameters, which in certain situations does not allow to obtain the optimal operating point. The paper compares the results obtained from the model with the P&O algorithm used at a constant and variable step.","PeriodicalId":356244,"journal":{"name":"2022 29th International Conference on Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and System (MIXDES)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 29th International Conference on Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and System (MIXDES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/mixdes55591.2022.9837976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The basic foundation for obtaining maximum power is reaching the maximum operating point (Maximum Power Point), which makes it the highest possible power produced by the panel in the given solar and temperature conditions. Achieving this power requires adjusting the voltage in the work cycle, which unfortunately requires a kind of “search” by “sampling” the value of the instantaneous power at a given voltage. However, it takes a certain time to reach the maximum power, which implies power losses. One of the best known and quite simple MPPT algorithms is P&O (Perturb and Observation). Its operation, however, has a certain disadvantage related to the abrupt change of parameters, which in certain situations does not allow to obtain the optimal operating point. The paper compares the results obtained from the model with the P&O algorithm used at a constant and variable step.
恒步长与变步长MPPT算法对光伏系统响应的比较
获得最大功率的基本基础是达到最大工作点(最大功率点),这使其成为在给定的太阳能和温度条件下电池板产生的最高可能功率。实现这个功率需要在工作周期中调整电压,不幸的是,这需要一种“搜索”,通过“采样”给定电压下的瞬时功率值。但是,达到最大功率需要一定的时间,这就意味着功率损耗。最著名和最简单的MPPT算法之一是P&O(扰动和观察)。但其运行存在参数突变的缺点,在某些情况下无法获得最优工作点。本文将该模型的结果与恒步长和变步长下的P&O算法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信