Ecohydrological nature-based solution for climate resilience and biodiversity enhancement in water-limited ecosystem: Perspectives and proof of concepts

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Mulugeta Dadi Belete
{"title":"Ecohydrological nature-based solution for climate resilience and biodiversity enhancement in water-limited ecosystem: Perspectives and proof of concepts","authors":"Mulugeta Dadi Belete","doi":"10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Following the declaration of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, nature-based solutions (NbS) are at the forefront of the sustainability discourse. However, this solution needs operational clarity to avoid the commonly mentioned vagueness of the concept. This paper highlighted application of the ecohydrological principles to guide the conception, planning, designing, implementation, and monitoring of nature-based solutions. The paper proposed an ecohydrological nature-based solution that is emanated from the natural sequence of self-regulating patch-interpatch at the </span>hillslope<span> scale to restore highly degraded hillslope in Lake Hawassa sub-basin of Ethiopian Rift Valley Basin. The active restoration site is found to have a </span></span>landscape organization index value of 0.94 (= 94% of the gradsect is consisting of resources conserving patches) as compared to 0.16 at the passive site. In terms of landscape functionality, the active site showed significant stability (p(x≤T) = 0.01), </span>infiltration (p(x≤T) = 0.001), and nutrient cycling (p(x≤T)=0.005). It also exhibited significant improvement in soil moisture (p(x≤T) = 0.001). Ecologically, the active site is found to be more diverse (richness index 18 (active) vs. 8 (passive); heterogeneous (Shannon diversity index=1.22 (active) vs. 0.44 (passive)); well distributed (Simpson's index= 0.62 (active) vs. 0.28 (passive)); less dominance of few species (Evenness index (0.99 (passive) vs. 0.96 (active)). Limitation of this study is linked with the short span of the restoration period which tends to be not adequate to observe the full ‘dual’ regulation between hydrology and biota. For this, the research can be considered as a prerequisite towards full restoration of the landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56070,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359323000988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the declaration of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, nature-based solutions (NbS) are at the forefront of the sustainability discourse. However, this solution needs operational clarity to avoid the commonly mentioned vagueness of the concept. This paper highlighted application of the ecohydrological principles to guide the conception, planning, designing, implementation, and monitoring of nature-based solutions. The paper proposed an ecohydrological nature-based solution that is emanated from the natural sequence of self-regulating patch-interpatch at the hillslope scale to restore highly degraded hillslope in Lake Hawassa sub-basin of Ethiopian Rift Valley Basin. The active restoration site is found to have a landscape organization index value of 0.94 (= 94% of the gradsect is consisting of resources conserving patches) as compared to 0.16 at the passive site. In terms of landscape functionality, the active site showed significant stability (p(x≤T) = 0.01), infiltration (p(x≤T) = 0.001), and nutrient cycling (p(x≤T)=0.005). It also exhibited significant improvement in soil moisture (p(x≤T) = 0.001). Ecologically, the active site is found to be more diverse (richness index 18 (active) vs. 8 (passive); heterogeneous (Shannon diversity index=1.22 (active) vs. 0.44 (passive)); well distributed (Simpson's index= 0.62 (active) vs. 0.28 (passive)); less dominance of few species (Evenness index (0.99 (passive) vs. 0.96 (active)). Limitation of this study is linked with the short span of the restoration period which tends to be not adequate to observe the full ‘dual’ regulation between hydrology and biota. For this, the research can be considered as a prerequisite towards full restoration of the landscape.

基于自然的生态水文解决方案,提高限水生态系统的气候适应能力和生物多样性:观点和概念验证
在宣布联合国生态系统恢复十年之后,基于自然的解决方案(NbS)处于可持续发展话语的前沿。然而,这个解决方案需要操作清晰,以避免通常提到的概念模糊。本文重点介绍了生态水文原理在指导基于自然的解决方案的概念、规划、设计、实施和监测中的应用。本文提出了一种基于生态水文自然的解决方案,该方案源于山坡尺度上自我调节的斑块-间片自然序列,以恢复埃塞俄比亚大裂谷盆地哈瓦萨湖亚盆地高度退化的山坡。主动修复样地的景观组织指数为0.94(94%的样地由资源保护斑块组成),而被动修复样地的景观组织指数为0.16。在景观功能方面,活性位点表现出显著的稳定性(p(x≤T)= 0.01)、入渗(p(x≤T)= 0.001)和养分循环(p(x≤T)=0.005)。土壤湿度也有显著改善(p(x≤T) = 0.001)。生态上,活性位点的丰富度指数为18(主动)比8(被动);异质性(Shannon多样性指数=1.22(主动)vs. 0.44(被动));分布良好(辛普森指数= 0.62(主动)vs. 0.28(被动));少数物种的优势度较低(均匀度指数为0.99(被动)对0.96(主动))。本研究的局限性在于恢复周期较短,不足以充分观察到水文与生物群之间的“双重”调节。因此,这项研究可以被认为是全面恢复景观的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology is an international journal that aims to advance ecohydrology as the study of the interplay between ecological and hydrological processes from molecular to river basin scales, and to promote its implementation as an integrative management tool to harmonize societal needs with biosphere potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信