Testing the Application of Warranting Theory to Online Third Party Marketplaces: The Effects of Information Uniqueness and Product Type

W. S. Sanders, Gopi Chand Nutakki, O. Nasraoui
{"title":"Testing the Application of Warranting Theory to Online Third Party Marketplaces: The Effects of Information Uniqueness and Product Type","authors":"W. S. Sanders, Gopi Chand Nutakki, O. Nasraoui","doi":"10.1145/2930971.2930988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online third party marketplaces link buyers and sellers by providing a neutral platform for exchange. However, this requires buyers to assess the quality of goods without being able to handle or sample them. Recent research has proposed extending the warranting principle, an emerging theory of online interpersonal impression formation, to the judgements consumer make about products online. The warranting principle holds that information that is more difficult to manufacture or manipulate, such as an individualized photo of an auction item, should be more informative to a consumers judgement of the product than information which is easy to falsify or manipulate. While this theoretical extension assumes that all online goods are capable of being assessed in the same way, some goods (i.e. experience goods) are more difficult to assess in online marketplaces because they must be experienced before their true quality and characteristics can be known. The current study examines 2,401 completed auctions from eBay revealing that the relationship between warranting cues and price discounts is moderated by the type of good being sold. The theoretical contributions and limitations of the study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":227482,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Online third party marketplaces link buyers and sellers by providing a neutral platform for exchange. However, this requires buyers to assess the quality of goods without being able to handle or sample them. Recent research has proposed extending the warranting principle, an emerging theory of online interpersonal impression formation, to the judgements consumer make about products online. The warranting principle holds that information that is more difficult to manufacture or manipulate, such as an individualized photo of an auction item, should be more informative to a consumers judgement of the product than information which is easy to falsify or manipulate. While this theoretical extension assumes that all online goods are capable of being assessed in the same way, some goods (i.e. experience goods) are more difficult to assess in online marketplaces because they must be experienced before their true quality and characteristics can be known. The current study examines 2,401 completed auctions from eBay revealing that the relationship between warranting cues and price discounts is moderated by the type of good being sold. The theoretical contributions and limitations of the study are discussed.
担保理论在网络第三方市场的应用检验:信息唯一性和产品类型的影响
在线第三方市场通过提供中立的交易平台将买家和卖家联系起来。然而,这要求买家在无法处理或取样的情况下评估商品的质量。最近的研究提出将担保原则(一种新兴的网络人际印象形成理论)扩展到消费者对网络产品的判断。保证原则认为,更难制造或操纵的信息,如拍卖物品的个性化照片,应该比容易伪造或操纵的信息更有助于消费者对产品的判断。虽然这一理论延伸假设所有在线商品都能够以相同的方式进行评估,但一些商品(即体验商品)在在线市场中更难评估,因为它们必须经过体验才能了解其真正的质量和特征。目前的研究调查了eBay上完成的2401次拍卖,发现担保线索和价格折扣之间的关系受到出售商品类型的影响。讨论了本研究的理论贡献和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信