Comparison of Four Distance Measures for Long Time Text-Independent Speaker Identification

S. Ong, S. Sridharan, Cheng-Hong Yang, M. Moody
{"title":"Comparison of Four Distance Measures for Long Time Text-Independent Speaker Identification","authors":"S. Ong, S. Sridharan, Cheng-Hong Yang, M. Moody","doi":"10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, four distance measures were compared for text-independent speaker identitication using the long time statistical feature averaging method. The four methods were the City block, the Euclidean, the Weighted Euclidean, and the Mahalanobis distance measures. Identification decision was based on the minimum distance criterion. This study showed that the Weighted Euclidean distance measure performed best, and the Mahalanobis distance measure did not perform well. An explanation is advanced for this result.","PeriodicalId":359344,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications","volume":"480 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPA.1996.615758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In this study, four distance measures were compared for text-independent speaker identitication using the long time statistical feature averaging method. The four methods were the City block, the Euclidean, the Weighted Euclidean, and the Mahalanobis distance measures. Identification decision was based on the minimum distance criterion. This study showed that the Weighted Euclidean distance measure performed best, and the Mahalanobis distance measure did not perform well. An explanation is advanced for this result.
四种距离度量在长时间文本无关说话人识别中的比较
在本研究中,使用长时间统计特征平均方法对四种距离度量进行了文本无关说话人识别的比较。这四种方法分别是城市街区距离测量法、欧几里得距离测量法、加权欧几里得距离测量法和马氏距离测量法。识别决策基于最小距离准则。本研究表明,加权欧几里得距离测度的效果最好,而马氏距离测度的效果不佳。对这一结果提出了一种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信