Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of simultaneous laparoscopic operations in acute appendicitis accompanied by various gynecological pathologies

Asmar Mustafayeva
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of simultaneous laparoscopic operations in acute appendicitis accompanied by various gynecological pathologies","authors":"Asmar Mustafayeva","doi":"10.31405/ijap.4-5.18.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. According to the World Health Organization 20 to 30% of gynecological pathologies in women are assosiatedwith surgical pathology and these challenge surgeons and gynecologists to correct these pathologiessimultaneously. The study aimed to evaluation of effectiveness of simultaneous laparoscopic operations in acute appendicitis accompanied by various gynecological pathologies \nMaterial and Methods. Total 88 patients were involved in the study. Of these, 55 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery - appendectomy (A control subgroup) and 33 simultan surgeries (core B subgroups). Diagnosis of acute abdomenal in gynecological patients, including diagnostic laparoscopy, was performed on the basis of algorithm. Comparison of arterial pressure, heart rate, intensity of pain and patients' activation period was studied in control and main subgroups during surgery and postoperative period. \nResults. Comparative analysis has showed that the statistical difference between these parameters in patients with isolated appendectomy and simultaneous surgery is almost inaccurate and simultaneous operation may be adequate, despite the complex effects of some negative factors of laparoscopy.","PeriodicalId":306274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antibiotics and Probiotics","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antibiotics and Probiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31405/ijap.4-5.18.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. According to the World Health Organization 20 to 30% of gynecological pathologies in women are assosiatedwith surgical pathology and these challenge surgeons and gynecologists to correct these pathologiessimultaneously. The study aimed to evaluation of effectiveness of simultaneous laparoscopic operations in acute appendicitis accompanied by various gynecological pathologies Material and Methods. Total 88 patients were involved in the study. Of these, 55 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery - appendectomy (A control subgroup) and 33 simultan surgeries (core B subgroups). Diagnosis of acute abdomenal in gynecological patients, including diagnostic laparoscopy, was performed on the basis of algorithm. Comparison of arterial pressure, heart rate, intensity of pain and patients' activation period was studied in control and main subgroups during surgery and postoperative period. Results. Comparative analysis has showed that the statistical difference between these parameters in patients with isolated appendectomy and simultaneous surgery is almost inaccurate and simultaneous operation may be adequate, despite the complex effects of some negative factors of laparoscopy.
腹腔镜同步手术治疗急性阑尾炎伴多种妇科疾病的疗效比较分析
介绍。根据世界卫生组织的数据,20%至30%的女性妇科病理与外科病理有关,这就要求外科医生和妇科医生同时纠正这些病理。本研究旨在评价腹腔镜同时手术治疗急性阑尾炎伴多种妇科病理的效果。共有88名患者参与了这项研究。其中,55例患者接受了腹腔镜手术-阑尾切除术(A对照组)和33例同时手术(核心B亚组)。基于该算法对妇科急腹症患者进行诊断,包括诊断性腹腔镜检查。比较对照组和主要亚组在手术和术后的动脉压、心率、疼痛强度和患者的激活期。结果。对比分析表明,孤立阑尾切除术患者的这些参数与同期手术的统计差异几乎是不准确的,尽管腹腔镜的一些负面因素影响复杂,但同期手术可能是足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信