Estimating Land Values When Seized for State Needs: Issues of Theory and Practice of Legal Regulation

Anna V. Grineva
{"title":"Estimating Land Values When Seized for State Needs: Issues of Theory and Practice of Legal Regulation","authors":"Anna V. Grineva","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-44-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study of the theory and practice of legal regulation of the estimating land values when seized for state needs is primarily due to the complexity of assessing a land plot as an object because the selection of analogue objects is significantly difficult due to the uniqueness of each land plot, the influence on its cost of a large number of random factors, as well as the absence of a single formula for calculating compensation. In turn, this has a great impact in each particular case when Russian courts appoint an evaluation examination and affects the final decision of the courts. The purpose is to identify the peculiarities of legal regulation and the established judicial practice of estimating the value of land plots when seized for state needs. Objectives: to reveal the specifics of the procedure of assessing the value of real estate objects for subsequent seizure; to evaluate the results of existing judicial practice in cases related to the seizure of land plots for state or mu-nicipal needs; to identify difficulties arising in the selection of analogous objects of land plots as objects of evaluation. Methodology. The study was carried out on the basis of the general scientific (dialectical) method of scientific knowledge, methods of analysis, comparison, formal legal, formal logical methods. The results of the study are distinguished by an applied nature with elements of scientific novelty in the identified approaches and conclusions on the valuation of land plots when seized for state needs. Conclusion. Compensation for losses in the seizure of land for state needs should be adequate, ensured by fair market value, which should allow the subject to buy real estate of the same characteristics.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"425 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-6-44-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study of the theory and practice of legal regulation of the estimating land values when seized for state needs is primarily due to the complexity of assessing a land plot as an object because the selection of analogue objects is significantly difficult due to the uniqueness of each land plot, the influence on its cost of a large number of random factors, as well as the absence of a single formula for calculating compensation. In turn, this has a great impact in each particular case when Russian courts appoint an evaluation examination and affects the final decision of the courts. The purpose is to identify the peculiarities of legal regulation and the established judicial practice of estimating the value of land plots when seized for state needs. Objectives: to reveal the specifics of the procedure of assessing the value of real estate objects for subsequent seizure; to evaluate the results of existing judicial practice in cases related to the seizure of land plots for state or mu-nicipal needs; to identify difficulties arising in the selection of analogous objects of land plots as objects of evaluation. Methodology. The study was carried out on the basis of the general scientific (dialectical) method of scientific knowledge, methods of analysis, comparison, formal legal, formal logical methods. The results of the study are distinguished by an applied nature with elements of scientific novelty in the identified approaches and conclusions on the valuation of land plots when seized for state needs. Conclusion. Compensation for losses in the seizure of land for state needs should be adequate, ensured by fair market value, which should allow the subject to buy real estate of the same characteristics.
为国家需要征用土地估价:法律规制的理论与实践问题
为国家需要征用土地时估算土地价值的法律法规的理论和实践研究的相关性主要是由于将地块作为对象进行评估的复杂性,因为由于每个地块的独特性、对其成本的大量随机因素的影响以及缺乏计算补偿的单一公式,选择模拟对象非常困难。反过来,这对俄罗斯法院指定评估审查的每一个具体案件都有很大的影响,并影响法院的最后决定。目的是确定法律规定的特殊性和为国家需要而征用土地时估算土地价值的既定司法实践。目的:揭示评估不动产价值的具体程序,以备后续查封;评估现有司法实践在与国家或市需要征用土地有关的案件中的结果;确定在选择类似地块作为评估对象时遇到的困难。方法。本研究是在一般科学(辩证)方法的基础上进行的,有科学知识的分析方法、比较方法、形式法学方法、形式逻辑方法。研究结果的特点是,在确定的方法和结论中,应用了科学新颖性的元素,这些方法和结论是在为国家需要而征用土地时对地块进行估值的。结论。为国家需要征用土地所造成的损失应得到充分补偿,并以公平的市场价值为保证,使主体能够购买具有相同特征的房地产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信