Intra-industry Trade in the EAEU: Case of Machine Building

Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019) Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.2991/icefb-19.2019.28

Yegor V. Pak

{"title":"Intra-industry Trade in the EAEU: Case of Machine Building","authors":"Yegor V. Pak","doi":"10.2991/icefb-19.2019.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the specifics of intraindustry trade in machine building in the EAEU in 2011-2018. Major quantitative tool applied is Grubel-Lloyd index computed for 10 pairs of the EAEU states. It has been revealed that mutual trade in machine building between Belarus and Russia is predominantly of the intra-trade status. Out of the troika states relative potential of intra-trade growth has been identified in Kazakhstan-Armenia, Kyrgyzstan-Belarus and KyrgyzstanKazakhstan pairs. However, lack of consistent intra-industry exchange in machine building between the EAEU members as well as absence of related supranational regulation do challenge the development of industrial cooperation in the EAEU. The paper concludes that common industrial policy with its digital and inclusive agenda might foster the industrial cooperation in the EAEU and, thus, deepen integration in the EAEU. Keywords—EAEU; Eurasian integration; intra-industry trade; machine building; industrial cooperation","PeriodicalId":165952,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icefb-19.2019.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper investigates the specifics of intraindustry trade in machine building in the EAEU in 2011-2018. Major quantitative tool applied is Grubel-Lloyd index computed for 10 pairs of the EAEU states. It has been revealed that mutual trade in machine building between Belarus and Russia is predominantly of the intra-trade status. Out of the troika states relative potential of intra-trade growth has been identified in Kazakhstan-Armenia, Kyrgyzstan-Belarus and KyrgyzstanKazakhstan pairs. However, lack of consistent intra-industry exchange in machine building between the EAEU members as well as absence of related supranational regulation do challenge the development of industrial cooperation in the EAEU. The paper concludes that common industrial policy with its digital and inclusive agenda might foster the industrial cooperation in the EAEU and, thus, deepen integration in the EAEU. Keywords—EAEU; Eurasian integration; intra-industry trade; machine building; industrial cooperation

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧亚经济联盟的产业内贸易:以机械制造业为例

本文研究了2011-2018年欧亚经济联盟机械制造业的产业内贸易特征。应用的主要量化工具是对10对欧亚经济联盟国家计算的格鲁贝尔-劳埃德指数。据了解，白罗斯与俄罗斯在机械制造方面的相互贸易占主导地位。在三驾马车国家中，哈萨克斯坦-亚美尼亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦-白俄罗斯和吉尔吉斯斯坦-哈萨克斯坦的内部贸易增长相对潜力已经确定。然而，欧亚经济联盟成员国之间在机械制造方面缺乏一致的行业内交流，以及缺乏相关的超国家监管，确实对欧亚经济联盟工业合作的发展提出了挑战。基于数字化和包容性议程的共同产业政策可以促进欧亚经济联盟的产业合作，从而深化欧亚经济联盟的一体化。Keywords-EAEU;欧亚一体化;产业内贸易;机械制造;产业合作

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)

自引率

0.00%

发文量