Protecting Homes and Other Types of Property

S. Stern, Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir
{"title":"Protecting Homes and Other Types of Property","authors":"S. Stern, Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479835683.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter questions the tendency of property law to bestow more generous protection against dispossession due to debts or other losses to residential property than to personal or commercial property or leasehold interests (i.e., renters). Contrary to this pattern in property law, the empirical psychology research on homes suggests only moderate psychological importance to maintaining ownership of one’s particular home, and substantial attachments and psychological interests in personal and commercial property. From the perspective of psychological loss, the strong property protection afforded to homes under tenancy by the entirety and homestead exemptions may be outsized. Conversely, the more limited protection of personal property and compensation for its loss under laws such as bankruptcy exemptions and bailment may be inadequate.","PeriodicalId":205822,"journal":{"name":"The Psychology of Property Law","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychology of Property Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479835683.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter questions the tendency of property law to bestow more generous protection against dispossession due to debts or other losses to residential property than to personal or commercial property or leasehold interests (i.e., renters). Contrary to this pattern in property law, the empirical psychology research on homes suggests only moderate psychological importance to maintaining ownership of one’s particular home, and substantial attachments and psychological interests in personal and commercial property. From the perspective of psychological loss, the strong property protection afforded to homes under tenancy by the entirety and homestead exemptions may be outsized. Conversely, the more limited protection of personal property and compensation for its loss under laws such as bankruptcy exemptions and bailment may be inadequate.
保护房屋和其他类型的财产
这一章质疑物权法的倾向,即对住宅财产的债务或其他损失给予更慷慨的保护,而不是对个人或商业财产或租赁权益(即租房者)的剥夺。与物权法的这种模式相反,对房屋的实证心理学研究表明,维持一个人对特定房屋的所有权只有适度的心理重要性,以及对个人和商业财产的实质性依恋和心理利益。从心理损失的角度来看,对整体租赁房屋和宅基地豁免的强烈财产保护可能会被夸大。相反,根据破产豁免和保释等法律对个人财产的较为有限的保护和对其损失的赔偿可能是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信