Evaluasi Rasionalisasi Stasiun Hujan Metode Kagan Rodda dengan Mempertimbangkan Kriteria Penentuan Lokasi Pembangunan Stasiun Hujan

Reza Renaldhy, I. W. Yasa, Ery Setiawan
{"title":"Evaluasi Rasionalisasi Stasiun Hujan Metode Kagan Rodda dengan Mempertimbangkan Kriteria Penentuan Lokasi Pembangunan Stasiun Hujan","authors":"Reza Renaldhy, I. W. Yasa, Ery Setiawan","doi":"10.21776/ub.pengairan.2021.012.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the rain station rationalization method using Kagan. In its application, the Kagan method can give results in the form of the number of stations and the location of the placement of the rain station network in an area. However, in its application in the field, the recommendation in the form of placement points does not meet the location criteria for the construction of a rain station. The results of the evaluation carried out at WS Sumbawa show that there are 116 rain stations that need to be added, but after being evaluated using Google Earth to see the suitability of the location against the criteria for the location of the rain station construction, only 36 points meet the criteria. To optimize this method, the recommendation points that do not meet the requirements are moved to the nearest water structure location such as a dam, embung or weir, so that 19 points are moved to the nearest water structure and 61 points are not recommended for the construction of a rain station. These results prove that the recommended number and placement points from the rationalization analysis of the Kagan method cannot be directly applied in the field, the recommendations given must be re-evaluated by taking into account the principles in determining the location of rain post construction.","PeriodicalId":236511,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Pengairan","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Pengairan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.pengairan.2021.012.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the rain station rationalization method using Kagan. In its application, the Kagan method can give results in the form of the number of stations and the location of the placement of the rain station network in an area. However, in its application in the field, the recommendation in the form of placement points does not meet the location criteria for the construction of a rain station. The results of the evaluation carried out at WS Sumbawa show that there are 116 rain stations that need to be added, but after being evaluated using Google Earth to see the suitability of the location against the criteria for the location of the rain station construction, only 36 points meet the criteria. To optimize this method, the recommendation points that do not meet the requirements are moved to the nearest water structure location such as a dam, embung or weir, so that 19 points are moved to the nearest water structure and 61 points are not recommended for the construction of a rain station. These results prove that the recommended number and placement points from the rationalization analysis of the Kagan method cannot be directly applied in the field, the recommendations given must be re-evaluated by taking into account the principles in determining the location of rain post construction.
基于确定雨站位置的标准,对雨站的合理性评价
本研究旨在评估利用卡根方法的雨站合理化方法。在实际应用中,卡根方法可以给出某一地区雨站网的台站数目和布局位置。但在实际应用中,以布置点形式提出的建议并不符合雨站建设的选址标准。在WS松巴瓦进行的评估结果显示,需要增加的雨站有116个,但在使用谷歌地球(Google Earth)根据雨站建设位置的标准对位置的适宜性进行评估后,只有36个点符合标准。为了对该方法进行优化,将不符合要求的推荐点移动到最近的大坝、堤防、堰等水结构位置,使19个点移动到最近的水结构,61个点不建议建设雨站。这些结果证明,由卡根法合理化分析得出的建议数量和布置点不能直接应用于现场,必须考虑确定雨后施工位置的原则,对所给出的建议进行重新评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信