Cost Comparisons of Backhaul Transport Technologies for 5G Fixed Wireless Access

Weisheng Xie, Nien-Tai Mao, Kirsten Rundberget
{"title":"Cost Comparisons of Backhaul Transport Technologies for 5G Fixed Wireless Access","authors":"Weisheng Xie, Nien-Tai Mao, Kirsten Rundberget","doi":"10.1109/5GWF.2018.8516977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixed wireless access (FWA) is an alternate means of providing Internet connectivity that uses radio spectrum rather than fixed lines. 5G will greatly improve FWA performances. There are a few backhaul transport technologies that can support 5G FWA. In this paper, we create models to compare the deployment cost of three typical backhaul transport technologies, namely wireless backhaul, direct fiber and passive optical network (PON). We also compare the deployment cost of FWA to that of fiber-to-the-home (FTTH). Various fiber cost scenarios are tested. From the modeling results, we find that wireless backhaul is the most cost-effective among the three backhaul technologies under high fiber costs, while direct fiber is the most cost-effective under low fiber costs. FWA is more cost-effective than FTTH when the fiber cost is above certain value.","PeriodicalId":440445,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 5G World Forum (5GWF)","volume":"367 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 5G World Forum (5GWF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/5GWF.2018.8516977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Fixed wireless access (FWA) is an alternate means of providing Internet connectivity that uses radio spectrum rather than fixed lines. 5G will greatly improve FWA performances. There are a few backhaul transport technologies that can support 5G FWA. In this paper, we create models to compare the deployment cost of three typical backhaul transport technologies, namely wireless backhaul, direct fiber and passive optical network (PON). We also compare the deployment cost of FWA to that of fiber-to-the-home (FTTH). Various fiber cost scenarios are tested. From the modeling results, we find that wireless backhaul is the most cost-effective among the three backhaul technologies under high fiber costs, while direct fiber is the most cost-effective under low fiber costs. FWA is more cost-effective than FTTH when the fiber cost is above certain value.
5G固定无线接入回程传输技术成本比较
固定无线接入(FWA)是一种使用无线电频谱而不是固定线路提供互联网连接的替代方法。5G将大大提高FWA性能。有一些回程传输技术可以支持5G FWA。在本文中,我们建立了模型来比较三种典型的回程传输技术,即无线回程、直接光纤和无源光网络(PON)的部署成本。我们还比较了FWA和光纤到户(FTTH)的部署成本。测试了各种光纤成本场景。从建模结果来看,在光纤成本较高的情况下,无线回程是三种回程技术中性价比最高的,而在光纤成本较低的情况下,直接光纤是性价比最高的。当光纤成本高于一定值时,FWA比FTTH更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信