EXPERTISE THE WORK ENVIRONMENT IS NOT PART OF THE MEDICAL EXPERTISE

Marcos Alvarez, Renata Alvarez
{"title":"EXPERTISE THE WORK ENVIRONMENT IS NOT PART OF THE MEDICAL EXPERTISE","authors":"Marcos Alvarez, Renata Alvarez","doi":"10.47005/230518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some operators of law prescribe that the medical expert is obliged to inspect the workplace in all analyzes of the causal link between illness and work carried out in the scope of the Labor Court (JT). The allegation of occupational disease is enough to establish the obligation. Failure to carry out the inspection would imply, as has been happening, in the annulment of the report, regardless of the technical indications. It is argued that Resolution CFM 2323/2022 would impose this obligation. The absence of medical experts in this discussion is notorious. This article presents a legal, ethical and technical review of the subject, revealing the lack of grounds for the imposition, the misinterpretations of Resolution CFM 2323/22, the harmful consequences that this conduct brings to the quality of the judicial provision, to workers, to employers that comply with health and safety standards and expert doctors. It then proposes a sequence of steps to be followed in order to determine the indications of expertise in the workplace, as well as define its objectives.","PeriodicalId":366101,"journal":{"name":"Perspectivas em medicina legal e pericias medicas","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectivas em medicina legal e pericias medicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47005/230518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some operators of law prescribe that the medical expert is obliged to inspect the workplace in all analyzes of the causal link between illness and work carried out in the scope of the Labor Court (JT). The allegation of occupational disease is enough to establish the obligation. Failure to carry out the inspection would imply, as has been happening, in the annulment of the report, regardless of the technical indications. It is argued that Resolution CFM 2323/2022 would impose this obligation. The absence of medical experts in this discussion is notorious. This article presents a legal, ethical and technical review of the subject, revealing the lack of grounds for the imposition, the misinterpretations of Resolution CFM 2323/22, the harmful consequences that this conduct brings to the quality of the judicial provision, to workers, to employers that comply with health and safety standards and expert doctors. It then proposes a sequence of steps to be followed in order to determine the indications of expertise in the workplace, as well as define its objectives.
专业知识工作环境不是医学专业知识的一部分
一些法律规定,医疗专家有义务在劳动法院范围内对疾病与工作之间的因果关系进行的所有分析中检查工作场所。职业病的指控就足以确立义务。如已发生的那样,不进行视察就意味着不论技术指标如何,报告都将被废除。有人认为,CFM 2323/2022号决议将规定这一义务。在这次讨论中没有医学专家是臭名昭著的。本文对这一问题进行了法律、道德和技术审查,揭示了强制执行的理由不足、对CFM 2323/22号决议的误解、这种行为对司法规定的质量、对工人、对遵守健康和安全标准的雇主以及专家医生造成的有害后果。然后,它提出了一系列应遵循的步骤,以确定工作场所的专业知识指示,并确定其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信