Amoxycillin and ampicillin. A comparative study of in vitro sensitivity and induced morphological alterations in Serratia marcescens.

Japanese journal of microbiology Pub Date : 1975-06-01
M A Miller, N B Kuemmerle, G Gentile
{"title":"Amoxycillin and ampicillin. A comparative study of in vitro sensitivity and induced morphological alterations in Serratia marcescens.","authors":"M A Miller,&nbsp;N B Kuemmerle,&nbsp;G Gentile","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro antibacterial activities of ampicillin and amoxycillin were compared against pigmented and non-pigmented strains of Serratia marcescens. Ampicillin appeared more effective than amoxycillin; three-fourths of all strains consistently exhibited an ampicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of at least one tube less than that recorded for amoxycillin. Complete cross resistance was not observed as has previously been inferred. Further, greater bactericidal activity was demonstrated with ampicillin; minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were either the same as or one tube greater than the MIC. MBC's for amoxycillin, however, were significantly higher; often four to five times greater than the MIC. Ampicillin exhibited greater bactericidal activity as inferred from differences observed in the biological lesions induced, as recorded through observations by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Spheroplasts were the predominant morphological alteration induced by ampicillin. In contrast, only filament formation, which demonstrated a degree of reversibility, was induced by amoxycillin.</p>","PeriodicalId":14559,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of microbiology","volume":"19 3","pages":"219-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro antibacterial activities of ampicillin and amoxycillin were compared against pigmented and non-pigmented strains of Serratia marcescens. Ampicillin appeared more effective than amoxycillin; three-fourths of all strains consistently exhibited an ampicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of at least one tube less than that recorded for amoxycillin. Complete cross resistance was not observed as has previously been inferred. Further, greater bactericidal activity was demonstrated with ampicillin; minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were either the same as or one tube greater than the MIC. MBC's for amoxycillin, however, were significantly higher; often four to five times greater than the MIC. Ampicillin exhibited greater bactericidal activity as inferred from differences observed in the biological lesions induced, as recorded through observations by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Spheroplasts were the predominant morphological alteration induced by ampicillin. In contrast, only filament formation, which demonstrated a degree of reversibility, was induced by amoxycillin.

阿莫西林和氨苄西林。粘质沙雷菌体外敏感性及诱导形态改变的比较研究。
比较氨苄西林和阿莫西林对着色型和非着色型粘质沙雷菌的体外抑菌活性。氨苄西林比阿莫西林更有效;四分之三的菌株始终表现出氨苄西林最低抑制浓度(MIC)至少比记录的阿莫西林低一管。完全的交叉阻力没有像先前推断的那样被观察到。此外,氨苄西林具有更强的杀菌活性;最低杀菌浓度(MBC)与最低杀菌浓度相同或比最低杀菌浓度高一管。然而,阿莫西林的MBC明显较高;通常是MIC的四到五倍。氨苄西林表现出更强的杀菌活性,这是通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察到的生物病变的差异推断出来的。球状体是氨苄西林诱导的主要形态改变。相比之下,阿莫西林只诱导纤维形成,表现出一定程度的可逆性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信