Is Modified Del Nido Cardioplegia as Effective as Del Nido Cardioplegia in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

Kemal Karaarslan, I. Erdinc
{"title":"Is Modified Del Nido Cardioplegia as Effective as Del Nido Cardioplegia in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?","authors":"Kemal Karaarslan, I. Erdinc","doi":"10.1532/hsf.4491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nIs modified del Nido cardioplegia superior to del Nido cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass patients?\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nAll patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass and retrospectively were analyzed. A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients who were given cold (+ 4-8C ') modified del Nido cardioplegia antegrade were evaluated. Other patients received classical del Nido cardioplegia. Hot shot warm blood cardioplegia was given to all patients before the cross-clamp was removed. The results of both groups were compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere was no significant difference between cardiac arrest times in both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group in the working of the heart. Less fibrillation was observed in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group. No difference found between the groups, regarding myocardial preservation. No decrease in hemoglobin was observed in the modified del Nido group on the postoperative first day.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe know that return to spontaneous sinus rhythm and fibrillation reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. At the same time, we can see that epicardial edema was less in the modified del Nido group. We think that less anemia is an advantage of modified del Nido cardioplegia.","PeriodicalId":257138,"journal":{"name":"The heart surgery forum","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The heart surgery forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.4491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Is modified del Nido cardioplegia superior to del Nido cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass patients? MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass and retrospectively were analyzed. A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients who were given cold (+ 4-8C ') modified del Nido cardioplegia antegrade were evaluated. Other patients received classical del Nido cardioplegia. Hot shot warm blood cardioplegia was given to all patients before the cross-clamp was removed. The results of both groups were compared. RESULTS There was no significant difference between cardiac arrest times in both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group in the working of the heart. Less fibrillation was observed in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group. No difference found between the groups, regarding myocardial preservation. No decrease in hemoglobin was observed in the modified del Nido group on the postoperative first day. CONCLUSIONS We know that return to spontaneous sinus rhythm and fibrillation reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. At the same time, we can see that epicardial edema was less in the modified del Nido group. We think that less anemia is an advantage of modified del Nido cardioplegia.
改良的德尔尼多心脏停搏器对孤立冠状动脉搭桥术患者是否与德尔尼多心脏停搏器一样有效?
目的改良德尔尼多心脏停搏术在冠状动脉搭桥术中是否优于德尔尼多心脏停搏术?材料与方法对所有行体外循环的患者进行回顾性分析。共有70名患者被纳入研究。对34例给予低温(+ 4-8C)改良del Nido顺行性心脏骤停的患者进行评价。其他患者接受经典德尔尼多心脏截瘫。所有患者在取下交叉钳前均给予热针温血停搏。比较两组结果。结果两组患者心脏骤停次数无显著性差异。改良del Nido停搏器组在心脏工作方面的差异有统计学意义。改良del Nido心脏骤停组纤维性颤动较少。在心肌保存方面,两组间没有发现差异。改良del Nido组术后第一天血红蛋白未见下降。结论自发性窦性心律和纤颤的恢复可减少缺血再灌注损伤。同时,我们可以看到改良del Nido组心外膜水肿较少。我们认为少贫血是改良德尔尼多心脏停搏术的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信