Penyelesaian Sengketa Pencemaran Laut Timor Akibat Kebocoran Sumur Minyak Montara Australia Antara Indonesia dan Australia

Maya Dwi Ambarwati
{"title":"Penyelesaian Sengketa Pencemaran Laut Timor Akibat Kebocoran Sumur Minyak Montara Australia Antara Indonesia dan Australia","authors":"Maya Dwi Ambarwati","doi":"10.15294/digest.v2i1.48633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyze the resolution of the Montara oil spill dispute between Indonesia and Australia. Analyze the responsibility of the Australian state for Timor Sea pollution due to the Montara oil leak. The analysis uses normative legal research using a statutory approach (statue approach), a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Whereas the settlement of the Montara oil spill dispute between Indonesia and Australia used a negotiation method whereby the Indonesian state filed a claim against Australia and demanded compensation for the effects of the oil spill, but Australia rejected the negotiations and the negotiations were unsuccessful. The form of responsibility of the Australian state is absolute, but in reality, if the responsibility seen or carried out is not in accordance with UNCLOS III 1982 because the Australian state is a drilling country carried out then giving permission to Thai companies in the ZEE region of the country.","PeriodicalId":141082,"journal":{"name":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v2i1.48633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyze the resolution of the Montara oil spill dispute between Indonesia and Australia. Analyze the responsibility of the Australian state for Timor Sea pollution due to the Montara oil leak. The analysis uses normative legal research using a statutory approach (statue approach), a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Whereas the settlement of the Montara oil spill dispute between Indonesia and Australia used a negotiation method whereby the Indonesian state filed a claim against Australia and demanded compensation for the effects of the oil spill, but Australia rejected the negotiations and the negotiations were unsuccessful. The form of responsibility of the Australian state is absolute, but in reality, if the responsibility seen or carried out is not in accordance with UNCLOS III 1982 because the Australian state is a drilling country carried out then giving permission to Thai companies in the ZEE region of the country.
本文分析了印尼与澳大利亚蒙塔拉石油泄漏纠纷的解决。分析澳大利亚政府对因蒙塔拉石油泄漏而造成的帝汶海污染的责任。分析使用规范性法律研究,使用法定方法(雕像方法),概念方法和案例方法。印度尼西亚和澳大利亚之间的蒙塔拉石油泄漏争端的解决采用了谈判的方法,印度尼西亚国家向澳大利亚提出索赔,要求赔偿石油泄漏的影响,但澳大利亚拒绝谈判,谈判没有成功。澳大利亚国家的责任形式是绝对的,但在现实中,如果看到或执行的责任不符合1982年联合国海洋法公约III,因为澳大利亚是一个钻探国家,然后允许泰国公司在该国的ZEE地区进行钻探。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信