Comparisons of Outcomes of Chin Implantation Using the Transoral Versus Submental Technique: A Systematic Review

The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1177/07488068221127831

C. Best, B. Best, J. Choi, J. Sykes, Hedyeh Javidnia

{"title":"Comparisons of Outcomes of Chin Implantation Using the Transoral Versus Submental Technique: A Systematic Review","authors":"C. Best, B. Best, J. Choi, J. Sykes, Hedyeh Javidnia","doi":"10.1177/07488068221127831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chin implantation is a commonly performed facial plastic surgery procedure. There are 2 approaches to this procedure: submental and transoral. There is no consensus as to which is the best and safest approach. Objective: The objective of this review is to ascertain the risks and benefits of using an intraoral versus submental approach for chin implantation. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from 1966 to 2020. Results: A total of 1410 articles were reviewed and 38 were chosen for the review based on predetermined selection criteria. Total complication rates in the transoral group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, whereas total complication rates in the submental group ranged from 0% to 15%. No clear difference in the rates of any specific complication was found between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There is no demonstrated difference in complication rates between the 2 approaches to chin implantation. Individual patient assessment and surgeon preference remain the most important determinants of surgical approach.","PeriodicalId":297650,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07488068221127831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chin implantation is a commonly performed facial plastic surgery procedure. There are 2 approaches to this procedure: submental and transoral. There is no consensus as to which is the best and safest approach. Objective: The objective of this review is to ascertain the risks and benefits of using an intraoral versus submental approach for chin implantation. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from 1966 to 2020. Results: A total of 1410 articles were reviewed and 38 were chosen for the review based on predetermined selection criteria. Total complication rates in the transoral group ranged from 0% to 14.7%, whereas total complication rates in the submental group ranged from 0% to 15%. No clear difference in the rates of any specific complication was found between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There is no demonstrated difference in complication rates between the 2 approaches to chin implantation. Individual patient assessment and surgeon preference remain the most important determinants of surgical approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

经口与颏下技术种植下颌的疗效比较:系统综述

背景:下巴种植是一种常见的面部整形手术。有两种方法:颏下和经口。对于哪种方法是最好和最安全的，目前还没有达成共识。目的:本综述的目的是确定采用口内入路与颏下入路进行下巴植入术的风险和益处。方法:对1966年至2020年在MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar上发表的所有文章进行系统回顾。结果:共纳入文献1410篇，按照预定的选择标准筛选出38篇纳入综述。经口组总并发症发生率为0% ~ 14.7%，而颏下组总并发症发生率为0% ~ 15%。两组患者的并发症发生率无明显差异。结论:两种入路的并发症发生率无明显差异。个体患者评估和外科医生的偏好仍然是手术方法的最重要决定因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery

自引率

0.00%

发文量