Comparison Study of Two Different Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems

Liqiang Duan, Wang Zhen, Liu Yulei, L. Pang
{"title":"Comparison Study of Two Different Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems","authors":"Liqiang Duan, Wang Zhen, Liu Yulei, L. Pang","doi":"10.1115/power2020-16695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The thermodynamic performances of the two different integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) systems are compared in this paper. Different from the previous comparison researches of ISCC systems based on different solar energy collecting technologies, the goal of this paper is to compare the integration characteristics of two different configurations of integrating concentrated solar energy into a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) system based on the same solar collector system. For the first kind of integrated solar gas-steam combined cycle system (ISCC1), the solar energy is introduced to the topping cycle of the gas-steam combined cycle system, while for the second kind of integrated solar gas-steam combined cycle system (ISCC2), the solar energy is introduced to the bottoming cycle of the GTCC system. The detailed system models are developed and their thermal performances are compared under different conditions. For ISCC1, the solar-to-electricity efficiency is higher than that of ISCC2 at the design condition when both the direct normal irradiation and ambient temperature are high due to more efficient energy conversion to electricity. However, the ISCC2 offers the advantages of higher solar-to-electricity efficiency and more solar power output when both the direct normal irradiation and ambient temperature are low. Two ISCC systems are good for energy saving, the ISCC1 consumes 4.412 × 108 kg of fuel a year, which is 2.803 × 106 kg less than that of ISCC2, and the ISCC1 has an annual solar-to-electricity efficiency of 23.93%, 0.88% higher than that of ISCC2. Detailed daily and monthly simulation results show that two systems have advantages of saving energy, and the simulations results show the obvious effects of different solar energy integration modes on the overall IGCC system performance. The achievements of this paper can offer valuable references for the design and operation optimization of ISCC system.","PeriodicalId":282703,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2020 Power Conference","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2020 Power Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/power2020-16695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The thermodynamic performances of the two different integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) systems are compared in this paper. Different from the previous comparison researches of ISCC systems based on different solar energy collecting technologies, the goal of this paper is to compare the integration characteristics of two different configurations of integrating concentrated solar energy into a gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) system based on the same solar collector system. For the first kind of integrated solar gas-steam combined cycle system (ISCC1), the solar energy is introduced to the topping cycle of the gas-steam combined cycle system, while for the second kind of integrated solar gas-steam combined cycle system (ISCC2), the solar energy is introduced to the bottoming cycle of the GTCC system. The detailed system models are developed and their thermal performances are compared under different conditions. For ISCC1, the solar-to-electricity efficiency is higher than that of ISCC2 at the design condition when both the direct normal irradiation and ambient temperature are high due to more efficient energy conversion to electricity. However, the ISCC2 offers the advantages of higher solar-to-electricity efficiency and more solar power output when both the direct normal irradiation and ambient temperature are low. Two ISCC systems are good for energy saving, the ISCC1 consumes 4.412 × 108 kg of fuel a year, which is 2.803 × 106 kg less than that of ISCC2, and the ISCC1 has an annual solar-to-electricity efficiency of 23.93%, 0.88% higher than that of ISCC2. Detailed daily and monthly simulation results show that two systems have advantages of saving energy, and the simulations results show the obvious effects of different solar energy integration modes on the overall IGCC system performance. The achievements of this paper can offer valuable references for the design and operation optimization of ISCC system.
两种不同集成太阳能联合循环系统的比较研究
本文比较了两种不同的集成太阳能联合循环(ISCC)系统的热力学性能。与以往基于不同太阳能集热器技术的ISCC系统的对比研究不同,本文的目的是比较基于同一太阳能集热器系统的两种不同配置将聚光太阳能集成到燃气轮机联合循环(GTCC)系统中的集成特性。第一类集成太阳能燃气-蒸汽联合循环系统(ISCC1)将太阳能引入燃气-蒸汽联合循环系统的顶循环,第二类集成太阳能燃气-蒸汽联合循环系统(ISCC2)将太阳能引入GTCC系统的底循环。建立了详细的系统模型,并对不同工况下的热性能进行了比较。对于ISCC1而言,在正常直接照射和环境温度都较高的设计条件下,由于能量转化为电能的效率更高,因此ISCC1的光电效率高于ISCC2。然而,ISCC2在直接正常照射和环境温度较低时具有更高的太阳能发电效率和更多的太阳能输出的优点。两套ISCC系统均具有较好的节能效果,其中ISCC1系统年耗油4.412 × 108 kg,比ISCC2系统少2.803 × 106 kg,年光电效率为23.93%,比ISCC2系统高0.88%。详细的日、月模拟结果表明,两种系统均具有节能优势,模拟结果表明,不同太阳能集成方式对IGCC系统整体性能的影响较为明显。本文的研究成果可为ISCC系统的设计和运行优化提供有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信