Assessment of the effectiveness biophysical soil and water conservation structures: A case study of Kiramuworeda, East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia

Tasfaye Fayera
{"title":"Assessment of the effectiveness biophysical soil and water conservation structures: A case study of Kiramuworeda, East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia","authors":"Tasfaye Fayera","doi":"10.33292/areste.v1i2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil erosion is one of the most serious global environmental issues affecting agriculture and soil fertility. On a global scale, water erosion is the most common type of soil erosion in agricultural areas, reducing the soil's ability to support productive agriculture. The efficiency of biophysical soil and water conservation systems must be evaluated before solutions for limiting soil losses may be considered. To promote sustainable land use in the study area, it is critical to understand farmers' knowledge of soil and water conservation structures, as well as the factors that influence their land management practices. Farmers in the study region are well-informed about soil and water conservation structures in general, as well as their causes, indications, and the amount of their plot of land that is susceptible to soil erosion in particular. Furthermore, they feature both traditional and modern soil conservation structures that are successful. However, several impediments to implementing the Soil and Water Conservation structures were found, including a lack of finance, the small area of their land, and other socio-economic and physical aspects. Furthermore, farmers had a highly positive attitude regarding the importance of contemporary Soil and Water Conservation structures. Their awareness, on the other hand, appears to be incorrect. Because they believe that the present SWC Structure is a government-led initiative to rehabilitate highly degraded areas rather than a mechanism of soil and water conservation on agricultural land. They believe that the structures take up a huge portion of a relatively small plot of land, preventing them from properly utilizing it. As a result, it is suggested that the government's policies and strategies, as well as corrective intervention from non-governmental organizations aimed at this issue and community participation in encouraging farmers to participate in soil and water conservation practices, are critical to resolving current poverty, food insecurity, and environmental degradation in the study area.","PeriodicalId":237717,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33292/areste.v1i2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Soil erosion is one of the most serious global environmental issues affecting agriculture and soil fertility. On a global scale, water erosion is the most common type of soil erosion in agricultural areas, reducing the soil's ability to support productive agriculture. The efficiency of biophysical soil and water conservation systems must be evaluated before solutions for limiting soil losses may be considered. To promote sustainable land use in the study area, it is critical to understand farmers' knowledge of soil and water conservation structures, as well as the factors that influence their land management practices. Farmers in the study region are well-informed about soil and water conservation structures in general, as well as their causes, indications, and the amount of their plot of land that is susceptible to soil erosion in particular. Furthermore, they feature both traditional and modern soil conservation structures that are successful. However, several impediments to implementing the Soil and Water Conservation structures were found, including a lack of finance, the small area of their land, and other socio-economic and physical aspects. Furthermore, farmers had a highly positive attitude regarding the importance of contemporary Soil and Water Conservation structures. Their awareness, on the other hand, appears to be incorrect. Because they believe that the present SWC Structure is a government-led initiative to rehabilitate highly degraded areas rather than a mechanism of soil and water conservation on agricultural land. They believe that the structures take up a huge portion of a relatively small plot of land, preventing them from properly utilizing it. As a result, it is suggested that the government's policies and strategies, as well as corrective intervention from non-governmental organizations aimed at this issue and community participation in encouraging farmers to participate in soil and water conservation practices, are critical to resolving current poverty, food insecurity, and environmental degradation in the study area.
生物物理水土保持结构的有效性评价——以埃塞俄比亚东沃勒加地区Kiramuworeda为例
土壤侵蚀是影响农业和土壤肥力的最严重的全球性环境问题之一。在全球范围内,水土流失是农业地区最常见的水土流失类型,降低了土壤支持生产性农业的能力。在考虑限制土壤流失的解决方案之前,必须先评估生物物理水土保持系统的效率。为了促进研究区土地的可持续利用,了解农民对水土保持结构的了解以及影响他们土地管理实践的因素至关重要。研究区域的农民普遍了解水土保持结构,以及它们的原因、迹象,特别是易受水土流失影响的土地面积。此外,它们还具有传统和现代成功的土壤保持结构。但是,在执行水土保持结构方面发现了若干障碍,包括缺乏资金、土地面积小以及其他社会经济和物质方面。此外,农民对当代水土保持结构的重要性持高度肯定的态度。另一方面,他们的意识似乎是不正确的。因为他们认为目前的SWC结构是政府主导的恢复高度退化地区的举措,而不是农业用地的水土保持机制。他们认为,这些建筑占据了一块相对较小的土地的很大一部分,使他们无法正确利用它。因此,建议政府的政策和战略,以及非政府组织针对这一问题的纠正干预,以及社区参与鼓励农民参与水土保持实践,对于解决研究地区当前的贫困,粮食不安全和环境退化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信