Les études d’impact dans l’action publique en France : perspective critique et propositions

Thomas Perroud
{"title":"Les études d’impact dans l’action publique en France : perspective critique et propositions","authors":"Thomas Perroud","doi":"10.3166/pmp.35.2018.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impact Assessment and Public Action in France: critical perspective and proposals for reform. The use of impact assessments has been a common place in the public administration discourse in France since the 1990s. This tool, enshrined in organic law, is largely a disappointment. The objective was to reduce legislative inflation and draft more evidence-based rules. This objective was not met. We are trying, in this article, to understand the reasons for the failure. The place of the Conseil d’État in the reform as well as the absence of any reflection on the place of research in public action can account for it. We then try to make policy proposals to improve the drafting of public policies in France. © 2018 IDMP/Lavoisier SAS. Tous droits réservés","PeriodicalId":426902,"journal":{"name":"Politiques et management public","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politiques et management public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3166/pmp.35.2018.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Impact Assessment and Public Action in France: critical perspective and proposals for reform. The use of impact assessments has been a common place in the public administration discourse in France since the 1990s. This tool, enshrined in organic law, is largely a disappointment. The objective was to reduce legislative inflation and draft more evidence-based rules. This objective was not met. We are trying, in this article, to understand the reasons for the failure. The place of the Conseil d’État in the reform as well as the absence of any reflection on the place of research in public action can account for it. We then try to make policy proposals to improve the drafting of public policies in France. © 2018 IDMP/Lavoisier SAS. Tous droits réservés
法国公共行动的影响研究:批判性观点和建议
法国的影响评估和公共行动:批判观点和改革建议。自20世纪90年代以来,影响评估的使用在法国的公共行政话语中一直很常见。这个被庄严载入组织法的工具在很大程度上令人失望。其目标是减少立法膨胀并起草更多基于证据的规则。这一目标没有实现。在本文中,我们试图了解失败的原因。État委员会在改革中的地位以及没有对研究在公共行动中的地位进行任何反思都是造成这种情况的原因。然后,我们试图提出政策建议,以改善法国的公共政策起草。©2018 IDMP/拉瓦锡SAS。我们的权利是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信