INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDY OF THE INDONESIA-MALAYSIA REGIONAL DISPUTE ABOUT SIPADAN AND LIGITAN ISLANDS IN THE SULAWESI SEA

I. G. N. K. K. P. Kelakan, T. I. D. K. Dewi
{"title":"INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STUDY OF THE INDONESIA-MALAYSIA REGIONAL DISPUTE ABOUT SIPADAN AND LIGITAN ISLANDS IN THE SULAWESI SEA","authors":"I. G. N. K. K. P. Kelakan, T. I. D. K. Dewi","doi":"10.55047/polri.v2i1.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to look into the background of the island disputes between Indonesia and Malaysia over Sipadan and Ligitan from the perspective of international law. In addition to the reasons, the purpose of this study is to determine the settlement process between the two countries to resolve the dispute between Sipadan and Ligitan and its implications for international law. It also aims to find out the reasons for the International Court of Justice in determining the winner of the dispute between the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan. This study uses descriptive methods, normative methods based on international law, and data collection techniques to analyze the data obtained through online search techniques and comparative research approaches. The results of this study show that the cause of the dispute between the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan originated from the absence of the two islands on the national maps of Malaysia and Indonesia, which then the two countries took steps to negotiate in international forums in resolving the dispute. It is also known that the main factor considered in determining the winner by the International Court of Justice is the comparison of the effectiveness of the management of the disputed area.","PeriodicalId":434803,"journal":{"name":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i1.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to look into the background of the island disputes between Indonesia and Malaysia over Sipadan and Ligitan from the perspective of international law. In addition to the reasons, the purpose of this study is to determine the settlement process between the two countries to resolve the dispute between Sipadan and Ligitan and its implications for international law. It also aims to find out the reasons for the International Court of Justice in determining the winner of the dispute between the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan. This study uses descriptive methods, normative methods based on international law, and data collection techniques to analyze the data obtained through online search techniques and comparative research approaches. The results of this study show that the cause of the dispute between the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan originated from the absence of the two islands on the national maps of Malaysia and Indonesia, which then the two countries took steps to negotiate in international forums in resolving the dispute. It is also known that the main factor considered in determining the winner by the International Court of Justice is the comparison of the effectiveness of the management of the disputed area.
印尼与马来西亚关于苏拉威西海上西巴丹岛和利吉丹岛地区争端的国际法律研究
本文的目的是从国际法的角度来探讨印尼和马来西亚在西巴丹和利吉丹的岛屿争端的背景。除了原因之外,本研究的目的是确定两国之间解决西巴丹和利吉坦之间争端的解决过程及其对国际法的影响。它还旨在找出国际法院在西巴丹岛和利吉丹岛之间的争端中决定赢家的原因。本研究采用描述性方法、基于国际法的规范性方法和数据收集技术,对通过在线搜索技术和比较研究方法获得的数据进行分析。本研究的结果表明,西巴丹岛和利吉丹岛之间的争端的原因源于这两个岛屿在马来西亚和印度尼西亚的国家地图上的缺席,然后两国采取步骤在国际论坛上谈判解决争端。众所周知,国际法院在决定胜诉方时所考虑的主要因素是对争议地区管理效力的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信