Social networks as cross-border virtual spaces: legal opinion

E. V. Krasulya
{"title":"Social networks as cross-border virtual spaces: legal opinion","authors":"E. V. Krasulya","doi":"10.17223/9785946218597/19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The article deals with social networks as cross-border virtual spaces, the network architecture of which does not contain universal mechanisms for determining jurisdiction in cyberspace. Approaches to their description and typol-ogy are presented. Prerequisites for the development of legal regulation of social networks are described, and their ju-risdictional affiliation is determined. Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki and other social networks are legal entities, registered in specific States, as clearly evidenced by the user agreement (terms of use), which are offered to users and are considered accepted by an individual or legal entity upon joining. As a result, social networks and their millions of users find themselves in different jurisdictions, which potentially generates not only a “conflict of jurisdiction” but also a “conflict of qualifications”.","PeriodicalId":268201,"journal":{"name":"Digital Place Brand Management : Global and Local Aspects : The Collection of Materials of the 4th International Transdisciplinary Scientific and Practical WEB-Conference \"Connect-Universum – 2018\"","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Place Brand Management : Global and Local Aspects : The Collection of Materials of the 4th International Transdisciplinary Scientific and Practical WEB-Conference \"Connect-Universum – 2018\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/9785946218597/19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The article deals with social networks as cross-border virtual spaces, the network architecture of which does not contain universal mechanisms for determining jurisdiction in cyberspace. Approaches to their description and typol-ogy are presented. Prerequisites for the development of legal regulation of social networks are described, and their ju-risdictional affiliation is determined. Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki and other social networks are legal entities, registered in specific States, as clearly evidenced by the user agreement (terms of use), which are offered to users and are considered accepted by an individual or legal entity upon joining. As a result, social networks and their millions of users find themselves in different jurisdictions, which potentially generates not only a “conflict of jurisdiction” but also a “conflict of qualifications”.
作为跨境虚拟空间的社交网络:法律意见
. 本文将社交网络视为跨境虚拟空间,其网络架构不包含确定网络空间管辖权的普遍机制。提出了它们的描述和类型学方法。描述了社会网络法律规制发展的先决条件,并确定了其司法隶属关系。Instagram、Facebook、Twitter、YouTube、Vkontakte、Odnoklassniki等社交网络是在特定国家注册的法律实体,用户协议(使用条款)明确证明了这一点,用户协议(使用条款)是提供给用户的,个人或法律实体在加入时被视为接受。因此,社交网络及其数百万用户发现自己处于不同的司法管辖区,这不仅可能产生“管辖权冲突”,还可能产生“资格冲突”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信