A systematic review exploring a 'culturally appropriate' model of resilience: Based on resilience research done in India

Mahimna Vyas
{"title":"A systematic review exploring a 'culturally appropriate' model of resilience: Based on resilience research done in India","authors":"Mahimna Vyas","doi":"10.15614/IJPP/2021/V12I1/208977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in resilience has evolved slowly over time. The research done on resilience over the last five decades lacks the cultural sensitivity as well as how the community impacts the process of resilience (Ungar, 2004, 2005; Boyden & Mann, 2005). The study has primarily investigated the mainstream western population's individual understanding of healthy functioning. Thus, there is a gap in knowledge regarding cross-cultural validation of the findings and rigorous qualitative inquiries into the factors; that might be associated with resilience in the context of non-western communities and marginalized groups living among their 'conventional' neighbours in western settings. This review aims to analyse the current resilience research done in India and to formulate a culturally appropriate model of resilience for the population. Out of 86 relevant publications first identified through systematic search on several data bases, 8 studies were finalized and went through inductive thematic analysis of the content relevant to research questions. Following the analysis process, detailed analytical themes and final characteristics of the resilience model were established. The results show that resilience remains an amorphous concept that is affected by both individual and social influences. However, there are some clear and well-established global elements that transcend the bounds of culture. Incorporation of social and psychological inquiry is recommended for future research.","PeriodicalId":228398,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of positive psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of positive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15614/IJPP/2021/V12I1/208977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research in resilience has evolved slowly over time. The research done on resilience over the last five decades lacks the cultural sensitivity as well as how the community impacts the process of resilience (Ungar, 2004, 2005; Boyden & Mann, 2005). The study has primarily investigated the mainstream western population's individual understanding of healthy functioning. Thus, there is a gap in knowledge regarding cross-cultural validation of the findings and rigorous qualitative inquiries into the factors; that might be associated with resilience in the context of non-western communities and marginalized groups living among their 'conventional' neighbours in western settings. This review aims to analyse the current resilience research done in India and to formulate a culturally appropriate model of resilience for the population. Out of 86 relevant publications first identified through systematic search on several data bases, 8 studies were finalized and went through inductive thematic analysis of the content relevant to research questions. Following the analysis process, detailed analytical themes and final characteristics of the resilience model were established. The results show that resilience remains an amorphous concept that is affected by both individual and social influences. However, there are some clear and well-established global elements that transcend the bounds of culture. Incorporation of social and psychological inquiry is recommended for future research.
探索“文化上合适的”复原力模型的系统综述:基于在印度进行的复原力研究
随着时间的推移,对弹性的研究进展缓慢。过去五十年对弹性的研究缺乏文化敏感性,以及社区如何影响弹性的过程(Ungar, 2004,2005;Boyden & Mann, 2005)。本研究主要调查了西方主流人群对健康功能的个人理解。因此,在研究结果的跨文化验证和对这些因素进行严格的定性调查方面存在知识缺口;这可能与非西方社区和边缘化群体在西方环境中与“传统”邻居生活在一起的复原力有关。这篇综述的目的是分析目前在印度进行的恢复力研究,并为人口制定一个文化上合适的恢复力模型。通过对多个数据库的系统检索,首先确定了86篇相关出版物,其中8篇研究最终定稿,并对与研究问题相关的内容进行了归纳性专题分析。根据分析过程,建立了详细的分析主题和弹性模型的最终特征。结果表明,弹性仍然是一个无定形的概念,受到个人和社会影响的影响。然而,有一些清晰而成熟的全球因素超越了文化的界限。建议在未来的研究中结合社会和心理调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信