A Systematic Evaluation of the Philippine Innovation Ecosystem

R. Billones, Carlos Matthew P. Cases, Tanya V. Olegario, R. R. Vicerra, N. Bugtai, E. Dadios
{"title":"A Systematic Evaluation of the Philippine Innovation Ecosystem","authors":"R. Billones, Carlos Matthew P. Cases, Tanya V. Olegario, R. R. Vicerra, N. Bugtai, E. Dadios","doi":"10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While innovative ideas are the basis for most startup companies, a prolific and supportive innovation ecosystem is needed for these ideas to come to fruition. A systematic method to properly determine and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a particular innovation ecosystem must be achieved. This research study presents a systematic evaluation of the Philippines' innovation ecosystem based on Oxentia's guide for evaluating a typical entrepreneurial ecosystem known as “The Elements Review”. This guide lists each element to be evaluated and grouped it into four areas: 1) Universities, 2) Government, 3) Businesses, and 4) the Third Sector. The original “Elements Review” used a color descriptor system to visualize the state of the innovation ecosystem. This research study proposed a number rating system to replace the color descriptor system. Each element was given a rating between 1 to 3. A rating of “1” is the lowest performance, while a rating of “3” is the highest performance. The average scores for each element area are Universities/RTOs = 2.33, Government = 2.4, Businesses/Industry = 2.5, and the Third Sector = 1.4.","PeriodicalId":230810,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While innovative ideas are the basis for most startup companies, a prolific and supportive innovation ecosystem is needed for these ideas to come to fruition. A systematic method to properly determine and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a particular innovation ecosystem must be achieved. This research study presents a systematic evaluation of the Philippines' innovation ecosystem based on Oxentia's guide for evaluating a typical entrepreneurial ecosystem known as “The Elements Review”. This guide lists each element to be evaluated and grouped it into four areas: 1) Universities, 2) Government, 3) Businesses, and 4) the Third Sector. The original “Elements Review” used a color descriptor system to visualize the state of the innovation ecosystem. This research study proposed a number rating system to replace the color descriptor system. Each element was given a rating between 1 to 3. A rating of “1” is the lowest performance, while a rating of “3” is the highest performance. The average scores for each element area are Universities/RTOs = 2.33, Government = 2.4, Businesses/Industry = 2.5, and the Third Sector = 1.4.
菲律宾创新生态系统的系统评价
虽然创新的想法是大多数创业公司的基础,但要让这些想法开花结果,需要一个多产和支持性的创新生态系统。必须采用一种系统的方法来正确地确定和评估特定创新生态系统的优势和劣势。本研究基于Oxentia对典型创业生态系统的评估指南“the Elements Review”,对菲律宾的创新生态系统进行了系统评估。这份指南列出了每个需要评估的要素,并将其分为四个方面:1)大学,2)政府,3)企业,4)第三部门。最初的“元素回顾”使用颜色描述符系统来可视化创新生态系统的状态。本研究提出一种数字分级系统来取代颜色描述符系统。每个元素被赋予1到3之间的等级。“1”是最低的表现,“3”是最高的表现。各领域的平均分数依次为:大学/RTOs = 2.33、政府= 2.4、企业/产业= 2.5、第三部门= 1.4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信