Detección de exageración de síntomas mediante el SIMS y el MMPI-2-RF en pacientes diagnosticados de trastorno mixto ansioso-depresivo y adaptativo en el contexto medicolegal: un estudio preliminar

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Juan Luís Blasco Saiz, Laura Pallardó Durá
{"title":"Detección de exageración de síntomas mediante el SIMS y el MMPI-2-RF en pacientes diagnosticados de trastorno mixto ansioso-depresivo y adaptativo en el contexto medicolegal: un estudio preliminar","authors":"Juan Luís Blasco Saiz,&nbsp;Laura Pallardó Durá","doi":"10.1016/S1130-5274(13)70019-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this preliminary study is to find a symptom exaggeration pattern in patients diagnosed of mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and adjustment disorder in the medico-legal context. Overall sample (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26) was divided in two groups: bona fide patients (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) and suspected of malingering patients (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->14). The Spanish adaptations of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) were administered to all participants. Regarding the SIMS scores, the best discriminant scales found between groups were Total scale, Neurological Impairment (NI), Amnesic Disorders (AM), and Affective Disorders (AF) scales. Regarding the MMPI-2-RF scores, the best discriminant validity scales were, in order, Fs, Fp-r, F-r and FBS-r, and the best discriminant substantive scales were those regarding somatic complaints (RC1, HPC, NUC, and COG), thought<span></span> disorders (THD, RC8, and PSYC-r), and mood disorders (Rcd and ACT). Results support the use of both SIMS and MMPI-2-RF as a convergent source of information for the detection of symptom exaggeration in mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and adjustment disorder in the medico-legal context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":"24 3","pages":"Pages 177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1130-5274(13)70019-7","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130527413700197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aim of this preliminary study is to find a symptom exaggeration pattern in patients diagnosed of mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and adjustment disorder in the medico-legal context. Overall sample (n = 26) was divided in two groups: bona fide patients (n = 12) and suspected of malingering patients (n = 14). The Spanish adaptations of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) were administered to all participants. Regarding the SIMS scores, the best discriminant scales found between groups were Total scale, Neurological Impairment (NI), Amnesic Disorders (AM), and Affective Disorders (AF) scales. Regarding the MMPI-2-RF scores, the best discriminant validity scales were, in order, Fs, Fp-r, F-r and FBS-r, and the best discriminant substantive scales were those regarding somatic complaints (RC1, HPC, NUC, and COG), thought disorders (THD, RC8, and PSYC-r), and mood disorders (Rcd and ACT). Results support the use of both SIMS and MMPI-2-RF as a convergent source of information for the detection of symptom exaggeration in mixed anxiety-depressive disorder and adjustment disorder in the medico-legal context.

在医学法律背景下,SIMS和MMPI-2-RF在焦虑-抑郁和适应混合障碍患者中的症状夸大检测:一项初步研究
本初步研究的目的是发现在医学-法律背景下诊断为焦虑抑郁混合障碍和适应障碍的患者的症状夸大模式。总样本(n = 26)分为两组:真实患者(n = 12)和疑似装病患者(n = 14)。对所有参与者进行西班牙改编的《诈病症状结构化量表》(SIMS)和《明尼苏达多相人格量表-2-重构表》(MMPI-2-RF)。在SIMS评分方面,两组间的最佳判别量表为总量表、神经功能障碍量表(NI)、健忘症量表(AM)和情感性障碍量表(AF)。MMPI-2-RF评分的最佳判别效度量表依次为Fs、Fp-r、F-r和fps -r,最佳判别实质性量表为躯体主诉(RC1、HPC、NUC和COG)、思维障碍(THD、RC8和PSYC-r)和情绪障碍(Rcd和ACT)。结果支持使用SIMS和MMPI-2-RF作为医学-法律背景下混合性焦虑抑郁障碍和适应障碍症状夸大检测的聚合信息源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信