"Landmark Route": A Comparison to the Shortest Route

Eva Nuhn, F. König, S. Timpf
{"title":"\"Landmark Route\": A Comparison to the Shortest Route","authors":"Eva Nuhn, F. König, S. Timpf","doi":"10.5194/agile-giss-3-12-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Most navigation systems for pedestrians output the shortest route. However, there are findings that travellers do not use the shortest route when free to choose. One alternative to minimising spatial distance is the incorporation of landmark information in a shortest route algorithm. Yet, we do not know whether pedestrians prefer such a landmark route over the shortest route. Therefore, we perform a survey and show participants videos of a shortest and a landmark route. We let participants answer questions concerning navigation satisfaction, route communication, and route comparison. Our findings show that the landmark route is more favourable.\n","PeriodicalId":116168,"journal":{"name":"AGILE: GIScience Series","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGILE: GIScience Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-12-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Most navigation systems for pedestrians output the shortest route. However, there are findings that travellers do not use the shortest route when free to choose. One alternative to minimising spatial distance is the incorporation of landmark information in a shortest route algorithm. Yet, we do not know whether pedestrians prefer such a landmark route over the shortest route. Therefore, we perform a survey and show participants videos of a shortest and a landmark route. We let participants answer questions concerning navigation satisfaction, route communication, and route comparison. Our findings show that the landmark route is more favourable.
“地标路线”:与最短路线的比较
摘要大多数行人导航系统输出的是最短路线。然而,有研究发现,当旅客可以自由选择时,他们并不会选择最短的路线。最小化空间距离的一种替代方法是在最短路径算法中结合地标信息。然而,我们不知道行人是否更喜欢这样的地标路线,而不是最短的路线。因此,我们进行了一项调查,并向参与者展示了最短和具有里程碑意义的路线的视频。我们让参与者回答有关导航满意度、路线沟通和路线比较的问题。我们的研究结果表明,地标路线更有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信