POST-WAR RECOVERY OF EUROPE: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR UKRAINE

I. Pidorycheva
{"title":"POST-WAR RECOVERY OF EUROPE: EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR UKRAINE","authors":"I. Pidorycheva","doi":"10.35774/jee2022.02.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper studies the problems of a country’s recovery after a war or a military conflict. The European experience of restructuring the economy after World War II is investigated. The main focus of the paper is on the analysis of post-war Modernization and Re-Equipment Plan of France, entitled the Monnet Plan, and European Recovery Program, better known as the Marshall Plan. The plan for recovering the French economy is of interest to Ukraine due to the similarities in problems and challenges faced by France in 1946 and Ukraine now. Therefore, the paper reviews the methods and approaches employed by the French experts trying to modernize their country. It also determines the risks that the French tackled while implementing the Monnet Plan. The author highlights the progressiveness and identifies the peculiarities of the Marshall Plan used to restructure post-war Europe. Suggestions for its adaptation opportunities in the current Ukrainian conditions are based on the results of the generalization and systematization of the European experience. The author argues that Ukraine’s recovery should start from the structural transformation and transition from the agrarian raw economy to an industrial and innovative kind, achieved through establishment of modern high-tech digital Industry 4.0. Notably, Ukraine itself must show initiative in this if it wishes to avoid being side-lined as a middling agrarian state. Here, a strong and unyielding position of the national elite is of paramount importance, as is their defence of the national interests and the right of the Ukrainian state to innovative development EU membership. It is of key importance that the issue of granting Ukraine financial support is resolved, as it is a condition of ensuring its resilience and sustainability of its post-war economic growth. On its part, Ukraine must ensure transparency in the use of the international aid, eradicate corruption and misuse of funds allocation.","PeriodicalId":266223,"journal":{"name":"Vol 21, No 2 (2022)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vol 21, No 2 (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2022.02.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The paper studies the problems of a country’s recovery after a war or a military conflict. The European experience of restructuring the economy after World War II is investigated. The main focus of the paper is on the analysis of post-war Modernization and Re-Equipment Plan of France, entitled the Monnet Plan, and European Recovery Program, better known as the Marshall Plan. The plan for recovering the French economy is of interest to Ukraine due to the similarities in problems and challenges faced by France in 1946 and Ukraine now. Therefore, the paper reviews the methods and approaches employed by the French experts trying to modernize their country. It also determines the risks that the French tackled while implementing the Monnet Plan. The author highlights the progressiveness and identifies the peculiarities of the Marshall Plan used to restructure post-war Europe. Suggestions for its adaptation opportunities in the current Ukrainian conditions are based on the results of the generalization and systematization of the European experience. The author argues that Ukraine’s recovery should start from the structural transformation and transition from the agrarian raw economy to an industrial and innovative kind, achieved through establishment of modern high-tech digital Industry 4.0. Notably, Ukraine itself must show initiative in this if it wishes to avoid being side-lined as a middling agrarian state. Here, a strong and unyielding position of the national elite is of paramount importance, as is their defence of the national interests and the right of the Ukrainian state to innovative development EU membership. It is of key importance that the issue of granting Ukraine financial support is resolved, as it is a condition of ensuring its resilience and sustainability of its post-war economic growth. On its part, Ukraine must ensure transparency in the use of the international aid, eradicate corruption and misuse of funds allocation.
战后欧洲复苏:乌克兰的经验和教训
本文研究一个国家在战争或军事冲突后的复苏问题。研究了二战后欧洲经济结构调整的经验。本文的主要重点是分析战后法国的现代化和再装备计划,即莫内计划,以及欧洲复苏计划,即马歇尔计划。乌克兰对恢复法国经济的计划很感兴趣,因为法国在1946年面临的问题和挑战与乌克兰现在面临的问题和挑战相似。因此,本文回顾了法国专家为实现国家现代化所采用的方法和途径。它还决定了法国在实施莫内计划时所应对的风险。作者强调了先进性,并指出了用于重建战后欧洲的马歇尔计划的特点。在乌克兰目前的条件下,对其适应机会的建议是基于对欧洲经验的概括和系统化的结果。作者认为,乌克兰的复苏应从结构转型开始,通过建立现代高科技数字工业4.0,实现从农业原始经济向工业创新经济的转型。值得注意的是,如果乌克兰希望避免作为一个中等农业国家被边缘化,它自己必须在这方面表现出主动性。在这里,国家精英的坚定立场至关重要,因为他们捍卫国家利益和乌克兰国家创新发展欧盟成员国的权利。解决向乌克兰提供财政支持的问题至关重要,因为这是确保其战后经济增长的复原力和可持续性的一个条件。就乌克兰而言,它必须确保使用国际援助的透明度,根除腐败和滥用资金分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信