20 Years of Rigless ESPs in Alaska; What went Right, What went Wrong, What's Next?

John C. Patterson, G. Dornan, M. D. Jensen, G. Targac, Dave L Malone, Samer Cheblak, J. Y. Julian, Matthew Walker
{"title":"20 Years of Rigless ESPs in Alaska; What went Right, What went Wrong, What's Next?","authors":"John C. Patterson, G. Dornan, M. D. Jensen, G. Targac, Dave L Malone, Samer Cheblak, J. Y. Julian, Matthew Walker","doi":"10.2118/194419-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is not a technical paper about electric submersible pumps (ESP's), instead it traces the 20-year journey that has led to the development and successful application of multiple generations of rigless ESP conveyance systems in a commercial oilfield. The end result, after many lessons learned, is a success story in which over 300 rig interventions have been eliminated over a 20-year period, with savings of 100's of millions of dollars in intervention costs, reduced HSE exposure and many millions of barrels of additional production.\n Utilization of ESP technology in the West Sak viscous oil field in Alaska is challenging. The unconsolidated nature of the West Sak sands impacts the performance and reliability of conventional ESP systems due to sand production. This challenging environment causes ESP pump erosion and accumulation of sand in the tubing above the pump and in the lower completion below the ESP.\n The initial development of the West Sak formation was the basis for the original development of the through-tubing conveyed progressing cavity pump (TTCESPCP) in the mid 1990's. With time, the West Sak completions evolved from vertical wells to long horizontals, resulting in production capacity increasing beyond the capabilities of the 3.5 in. and 4 in. TTCESPCP systems. This led to the development of a 4.5 in. through-tubing ESP in the early 2000's. In this design, the PCP of the TTCESPCP system was replaced with a high capacity, centrifugal pump or through-tubing convenyed ESP (TTCESP).\n With time and successful experience utilizing the TTC systems, it became evident that although the through-tubing technology resulted in significant savings and increased production, the design was lacking in one major aspect – the ability to remove sand accumulation in the 7-5/8 in. production casing below the end of tubing. The inability to perform interventions without pulling the tubing, was leading to expensive and avoidable rig workovers not related to the ESP equipment. The resulting economics drove the development of a through-tubing, slickline (SL) deployed ESP that, when all components are removed, leaves a minimum diameter of 3.80 in. for well interventions below the end of the tubing. The wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP) system was launched in 2005 and was fully commercialized in 2014.\n Numerous papers have been written on this specific technology and references are provided at the end of this paper. This list does not represent a complete listing of all through-tubing technologies, as there are other systems with substantially different characteristics. This paper will focus only on the through-tubing technology development and evolution in Alaska. It will present the 20-year development history of the Alaskan through-tubing technology, how the system is deployed, answers to frequently ask questions, and as the title suggests – What went Right, What went Wrong, and What's Next?\n The development and successful commercial deployment of through-tubing ESP systems in Alaska has been a long journey, with many lessons learned in the evolution from conventional ESPs, to through-tubing PCP's and ESP's (TTC or Generation 1 (Gen 1)), to the wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP or Generation 2 (Gen 2)). It should be recognized that both technologies had a development phase, followed by a commercial deployment phase. There were unexpected problems and benefits that were encountered as the technology matured. The technical difficulties significantly increased while advancing from the TTC (primarily mechanical changes) to the WR technologies (which adds the electrical component of a downhole wet connect).","PeriodicalId":334026,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 16, 2019","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 16, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194419-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is not a technical paper about electric submersible pumps (ESP's), instead it traces the 20-year journey that has led to the development and successful application of multiple generations of rigless ESP conveyance systems in a commercial oilfield. The end result, after many lessons learned, is a success story in which over 300 rig interventions have been eliminated over a 20-year period, with savings of 100's of millions of dollars in intervention costs, reduced HSE exposure and many millions of barrels of additional production. Utilization of ESP technology in the West Sak viscous oil field in Alaska is challenging. The unconsolidated nature of the West Sak sands impacts the performance and reliability of conventional ESP systems due to sand production. This challenging environment causes ESP pump erosion and accumulation of sand in the tubing above the pump and in the lower completion below the ESP. The initial development of the West Sak formation was the basis for the original development of the through-tubing conveyed progressing cavity pump (TTCESPCP) in the mid 1990's. With time, the West Sak completions evolved from vertical wells to long horizontals, resulting in production capacity increasing beyond the capabilities of the 3.5 in. and 4 in. TTCESPCP systems. This led to the development of a 4.5 in. through-tubing ESP in the early 2000's. In this design, the PCP of the TTCESPCP system was replaced with a high capacity, centrifugal pump or through-tubing convenyed ESP (TTCESP). With time and successful experience utilizing the TTC systems, it became evident that although the through-tubing technology resulted in significant savings and increased production, the design was lacking in one major aspect – the ability to remove sand accumulation in the 7-5/8 in. production casing below the end of tubing. The inability to perform interventions without pulling the tubing, was leading to expensive and avoidable rig workovers not related to the ESP equipment. The resulting economics drove the development of a through-tubing, slickline (SL) deployed ESP that, when all components are removed, leaves a minimum diameter of 3.80 in. for well interventions below the end of the tubing. The wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP) system was launched in 2005 and was fully commercialized in 2014. Numerous papers have been written on this specific technology and references are provided at the end of this paper. This list does not represent a complete listing of all through-tubing technologies, as there are other systems with substantially different characteristics. This paper will focus only on the through-tubing technology development and evolution in Alaska. It will present the 20-year development history of the Alaskan through-tubing technology, how the system is deployed, answers to frequently ask questions, and as the title suggests – What went Right, What went Wrong, and What's Next? The development and successful commercial deployment of through-tubing ESP systems in Alaska has been a long journey, with many lessons learned in the evolution from conventional ESPs, to through-tubing PCP's and ESP's (TTC or Generation 1 (Gen 1)), to the wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP or Generation 2 (Gen 2)). It should be recognized that both technologies had a development phase, followed by a commercial deployment phase. There were unexpected problems and benefits that were encountered as the technology matured. The technical difficulties significantly increased while advancing from the TTC (primarily mechanical changes) to the WR technologies (which adds the electrical component of a downhole wet connect).
阿拉斯加20年无钻机esp什么是对的,什么是错的,下一步是什么?
本文不是一篇关于电潜泵(ESP)的技术论文,而是回顾了20年来在商业油田开发和成功应用多代无钻机ESP传输系统的历程。在吸取了许多经验教训后,最终的结果是一个成功的故事,在20年的时间里,超过300台钻机的修井作业被淘汰,节省了数亿美元的修井成本,降低了HSE风险,并增加了数百万桶的产量。ESP技术在阿拉斯加West Sak稠油油田的应用具有挑战性。由于出砂,West Sak砂的松散性质影响了常规ESP系统的性能和可靠性。这种具有挑战性的环境会导致ESP泵在泵上方的油管和ESP下方的完井中发生冲蚀和积砂。20世纪90年代中期,West Sak地层的初步开发是通过油管输送螺杆泵(TTCESPCP)最初开发的基础。随着时间的推移,West Sak完井从直井发展到长水平井,生产能力超过了3.5 in的能力。4英寸。TTCESPCP系统。这导致了4.5英寸的发展。在21世纪初出现了过油管ESP。在本次设计中,TTCESPCP系统的PCP被大容量离心泵或通过油管输送的ESP (TTCESP)所取代。随着时间的推移和使用TTC系统的成功经验,很明显,尽管过油管技术显著节省了成本并提高了产量,但该设计在一个主要方面存在不足,即消除7-5/ 8in井段积砂的能力。油管末端以下的生产套管。由于无法在不拔管的情况下进行修井作业,导致与ESP设备无关的修井作业成本高昂。由此产生的经济效益推动了通过油管、钢丝绳(SL)部署的ESP的发展,当所有组件拆除后,ESP的最小直径为3.80 in。对于油管末端以下的修井作业。电缆可回收ESP (WRESP)系统于2005年推出,并于2014年完全商业化。关于这一具体技术已经有很多论文,本文最后提供了参考文献。由于存在其他具有完全不同特性的系统,因此该列表并不代表所有过油管技术的完整列表。本文将重点介绍阿拉斯加贯油管技术的发展和演变。它将介绍阿拉斯加直通油管技术的20年发展历史,系统是如何部署的,常见问题的答案,以及正如标题所示,什么是正确的,什么是错误的,下一步是什么?通过油管ESP系统在阿拉斯加的开发和成功的商业应用经历了一段漫长的历程,从传统ESP到通过油管PCP和ESP (TTC或第一代(第一代)),再到电缆可回收ESP (WRESP或第二代(第2代)),我们吸取了许多经验教训。应该认识到,这两种技术都有一个开发阶段,然后是商业部署阶段。随着技术的成熟,会遇到意想不到的问题和好处。从TTC(主要是机械变化)到WR技术(增加了井下湿式连接的电气组件),技术难度显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信