Comparing a computing curriculum with the ACM/IEEE-CS recommendations

R. Biddle, E. Tempero
{"title":"Comparing a computing curriculum with the ACM/IEEE-CS recommendations","authors":"R. Biddle, E. Tempero","doi":"10.1109/SEEP.1996.534009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been an increased emphasis on monitoring the structure and coverage of tertiary education programmes, and on making the results more widely available. For programmes in the field of computing, one way to achieve this is to compare the curriculum to a known standard. We describe our experience in comparing our curriculum with the ACM/IEEE-CS recommendations. We describe our method of comparison and interpretation, and the conclusions we drew. We also address some issues that arose in doing the comparison, including the length of the overall programme, and differences in core and elective material.","PeriodicalId":416862,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEP.1996.534009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently there has been an increased emphasis on monitoring the structure and coverage of tertiary education programmes, and on making the results more widely available. For programmes in the field of computing, one way to achieve this is to compare the curriculum to a known standard. We describe our experience in comparing our curriculum with the ACM/IEEE-CS recommendations. We describe our method of comparison and interpretation, and the conclusions we drew. We also address some issues that arose in doing the comparison, including the length of the overall programme, and differences in core and elective material.
计算机课程与ACM/IEEE-CS建议的比较
最近,越来越强调监测高等教育方案的结构和覆盖面,并更加广泛地提供结果。对于计算机领域的课程,实现这一目标的一种方法是将课程与已知标准进行比较。我们描述了将我们的课程与ACM/IEEE-CS建议进行比较的经验。我们描述了我们的比较和解释方法,以及我们得出的结论。我们还解决了在进行比较时出现的一些问题,包括整个课程的长度,以及核心和选修材料的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信