The Study of the Effect of Transportation on Issuerelevant Thoughts in Narrative Persuasion

Kitae Kim, Jisoo Park
{"title":"The Study of the Effect of Transportation on Issuerelevant Thoughts in Narrative Persuasion","authors":"Kitae Kim, Jisoo Park","doi":"10.47636/gkca.2023.6.1.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The previous research of persuasive narrative messages has suggested that transportation into narratives prohibits issue-relevant thinking and critical thoughts on the issue, which is known as “the principle of incompatible of transportation and issue-relevant thought”. However, the previous research did not use narrative appeals with explicit persuasive intent and strong argument. Furthermore, the issues in the narratives were often not personally relevant. Hence, employing thought-listing techniques, this study tested the principle with persuasive narrative messages that had more explicit persuasive intention and more relevant issue to the participants. The findings of this study contradicts the principle: the extent to which the participants were transported into the story was not negatively associated with the number of issue-relevant thoughts, regardless of the valence of the thoughts. Consequently, this study suggests whether people are willing to think about the issue of persuasive narrative messages may be more related to the how explicitly the persuasive intent in narratives is presented in the narratives rather than transportation into the narratives.","PeriodicalId":236343,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge and Convergence Association","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge and Convergence Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47636/gkca.2023.6.1.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The previous research of persuasive narrative messages has suggested that transportation into narratives prohibits issue-relevant thinking and critical thoughts on the issue, which is known as “the principle of incompatible of transportation and issue-relevant thought”. However, the previous research did not use narrative appeals with explicit persuasive intent and strong argument. Furthermore, the issues in the narratives were often not personally relevant. Hence, employing thought-listing techniques, this study tested the principle with persuasive narrative messages that had more explicit persuasive intention and more relevant issue to the participants. The findings of this study contradicts the principle: the extent to which the participants were transported into the story was not negatively associated with the number of issue-relevant thoughts, regardless of the valence of the thoughts. Consequently, this study suggests whether people are willing to think about the issue of persuasive narrative messages may be more related to the how explicitly the persuasive intent in narratives is presented in the narratives rather than transportation into the narratives.
叙事说服中交通对议题相关思维的影响研究
以往对说服性叙事信息的研究表明,将叙事信息转移到叙事信息中,会阻碍问题相关思维和对问题的批判性思维,这被称为“运输与问题相关思维不相容原则”。然而,以往的研究并没有使用具有明确说服意图和强有力论据的叙事诉求。此外,叙事中的问题往往与个人无关。因此,本研究采用思想清单技术,使用具有更明确的说服意图和更相关的问题的说服性叙事信息来测试这一原则。这项研究的结果与这一原则相矛盾:无论想法的效价如何,参与者进入故事的程度与与问题相关的想法的数量并没有负相关。因此,本研究表明,人们是否愿意考虑有说服力的叙事信息问题,可能更多地与叙事中有说服力的意图在叙事中呈现的明确程度有关,而不是转移到叙事中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信