Alternative Evaluation of the Results of Key Comparisons of Electrical Capacitance Standards

O. Velychko, T. Gordiyenko, A. Sălceanu
{"title":"Alternative Evaluation of the Results of Key Comparisons of Electrical Capacitance Standards","authors":"O. Velychko, T. Gordiyenko, A. Sălceanu","doi":"10.1109/EPE50722.2020.9305541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practical application of traditional evaluation of the results of key comparisons of measurement standards may be difficult for accredited laboratories that wish to use National Metrology Institutes calibration service. Traditional using only the degree of equivalence of a National Metrology Institute standard with corresponding expanded uncertainty without any other characteristics for evaluating of calibration or measurement capabilities. The paper presents a proposed alternative evaluation of the results of key comparisons, which simplifies the analysis of National Metrology Institute calibration services. It envisages the use as a criterion of consistency of the obtained results of key comparisons of the En index to analyze of the degree of equivalence of National Metrology Institute standard and its expanded uncertainty. The practical application of the alternative evaluation for key comparison results for electrical capacitance standards is considered. This contributes to a more streamlined calibration of working standards of accredited laboratories for specific purposes.","PeriodicalId":250783,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical And Power Engineering (EPE)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical And Power Engineering (EPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE50722.2020.9305541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practical application of traditional evaluation of the results of key comparisons of measurement standards may be difficult for accredited laboratories that wish to use National Metrology Institutes calibration service. Traditional using only the degree of equivalence of a National Metrology Institute standard with corresponding expanded uncertainty without any other characteristics for evaluating of calibration or measurement capabilities. The paper presents a proposed alternative evaluation of the results of key comparisons, which simplifies the analysis of National Metrology Institute calibration services. It envisages the use as a criterion of consistency of the obtained results of key comparisons of the En index to analyze of the degree of equivalence of National Metrology Institute standard and its expanded uncertainty. The practical application of the alternative evaluation for key comparison results for electrical capacitance standards is considered. This contributes to a more streamlined calibration of working standards of accredited laboratories for specific purposes.
电容标准关键比较结果的可选评价
对于希望使用国家计量研究院校准服务的认可实验室来说,传统的对测量标准的关键比较结果进行评估的实际应用可能是困难的。传统上仅使用具有相应扩展不确定度的国家计量学会标准的等效度,而没有任何其他特征来评价校准或测量能力。本文提出了一种关键比较结果的替代评估方法,简化了国家计量院校准服务的分析。它设想使用En指数作为关键比较所得结果的一致性标准来分析国家计量院标准的等效程度及其扩大的不确定度。考虑了电容标准关键比对结果替代评价的实际应用。这有助于更精简地校正认可化验室的工作标准,以作特定用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信