An exploratory study into perceived task complexity, topic specificity and usefulness for integrated search

P. Ingwersen, C. Lioma, Birger Larsen, Peiling Wang
{"title":"An exploratory study into perceived task complexity, topic specificity and usefulness for integrated search","authors":"P. Ingwersen, C. Lioma, Birger Larsen, Peiling Wang","doi":"10.1145/2362724.2362780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the relations between user perceptions of work task complexity, topic specificity, and usefulness of retrieved results. 23 academic researchers submitted detailed descriptions of 65 real-life work tasks in the physics domain, and assessed documents retrieved from an integrated collection consisting of full text research articles in PDF, abstracts, and bibliographic records [6]. Bibliographic records were found to be more precise than full text PDFs, regardless of task complexity and topic specificity. PDFs were found to be more useful. Overall, for higher task complexity and topic specificity bibliographic records demonstrated much higher precision than did PDFs on a four-graded usefulness scale.","PeriodicalId":413481,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We investigate the relations between user perceptions of work task complexity, topic specificity, and usefulness of retrieved results. 23 academic researchers submitted detailed descriptions of 65 real-life work tasks in the physics domain, and assessed documents retrieved from an integrated collection consisting of full text research articles in PDF, abstracts, and bibliographic records [6]. Bibliographic records were found to be more precise than full text PDFs, regardless of task complexity and topic specificity. PDFs were found to be more useful. Overall, for higher task complexity and topic specificity bibliographic records demonstrated much higher precision than did PDFs on a four-graded usefulness scale.
综合搜索中感知任务复杂性、主题特异性和有用性的探索性研究
我们调查了用户对工作任务复杂性、主题特异性和检索结果有用性的感知之间的关系。23名学术研究人员提交了65项物理领域实际工作任务的详细描述,并评估了从PDF全文研究文章、摘要和书目记录等综合集合中检索到的文件[6]。研究发现,无论任务的复杂性和主题的特殊性如何,书目记录都比全文pdf更精确。发现pdf更有用。总的来说,对于更高的任务复杂性和主题特异性,在四级有用性量表上,书目记录比pdf显示出更高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信