Assessing link quality in IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks: Which is the right metric?

Angelos Vlavianos, Lap Kong Law, Ioannis Broustis, S. Krishnamurthy, M. Faloutsos
{"title":"Assessing link quality in IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks: Which is the right metric?","authors":"Angelos Vlavianos, Lap Kong Law, Ioannis Broustis, S. Krishnamurthy, M. Faloutsos","doi":"10.1109/PIMRC.2008.4699837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accurate determination of the link quality is critical for ensuring that functionalities such as intelligent routing, load-balancing, power control and frequency selection operate efficiently. There are 4 primary metrics for capturing the quality of a wireless link: RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indication), SINR (Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio), PDR (Packet-Delivery Ratio), and BER (Bit-Error Rate). In this paper, we perform a measurement-based study in order to answer the question: which is the appropriate metric to use, and under what conditions? We evaluate the relative accuracy of each metric by conducting experiments with multiple transmission rates and varying levels of interference on a large set of links. We observe that each metric has advantages and projects one or more limitations. Our study suggests that a careful consideration of these limitations is essential, and provides guidelines on the applicability of each metric.","PeriodicalId":125554,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"184","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2008.4699837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 184

Abstract

The accurate determination of the link quality is critical for ensuring that functionalities such as intelligent routing, load-balancing, power control and frequency selection operate efficiently. There are 4 primary metrics for capturing the quality of a wireless link: RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indication), SINR (Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio), PDR (Packet-Delivery Ratio), and BER (Bit-Error Rate). In this paper, we perform a measurement-based study in order to answer the question: which is the appropriate metric to use, and under what conditions? We evaluate the relative accuracy of each metric by conducting experiments with multiple transmission rates and varying levels of interference on a large set of links. We observe that each metric has advantages and projects one or more limitations. Our study suggests that a careful consideration of these limitations is essential, and provides guidelines on the applicability of each metric.
评估IEEE 802.11无线网络中的链路质量:哪个是正确的度量?
准确确定链路质量对于确保智能路由、负载平衡、功率控制和频率选择等功能有效运行至关重要。捕获无线链路质量的主要指标有4个:RSSI(接收信号强度指示)、SINR(信号干扰加噪声比)、PDR(分组传输比)和BER(误码率)。在本文中,我们进行了一项基于度量的研究,以回答以下问题:哪种度量是合适的,在什么条件下使用?我们通过在大量链路上进行多种传输速率和不同干扰水平的实验来评估每个度量的相对准确性。我们观察到,每个度量标准都有优点,并预测一个或多个限制。我们的研究表明,仔细考虑这些限制是必要的,并提供了每个指标适用性的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信