Does the Choice of Configuration Framework Matter for Developers? Empirical Study on 11 Java Configuration Frameworks

M. Sayagh, Zhen Dong, A. Andrzejak, Bram Adams
{"title":"Does the Choice of Configuration Framework Matter for Developers? Empirical Study on 11 Java Configuration Frameworks","authors":"M. Sayagh, Zhen Dong, A. Andrzejak, Bram Adams","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2017.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Configuration frameworks are routinely used in software systems to change application behavior without recompilation. Selecting a suitable configuration framework among the vast variety of existing choices is a crucial decision for developers, as it can impact project reliability and its maintenance profile. In this paper, we analyze almost 2,000 Java projects on GitHub to investigate the features and properties of 11 major Java configuration frameworks. We analyze the popularity of the frameworks and try to identify links between the maintenance effort involved with the usage of these frameworks and the frameworks' properties. More basic frameworks turn out to be the most popular, but in half of the cases are complemented by more complex frameworks. Furthermore, younger, more active frameworks with more detailed documentation, support for hierarchical configuration models and/or more data formats seem to require more maintenance by client developers.","PeriodicalId":306744,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 17th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 17th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2017.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Configuration frameworks are routinely used in software systems to change application behavior without recompilation. Selecting a suitable configuration framework among the vast variety of existing choices is a crucial decision for developers, as it can impact project reliability and its maintenance profile. In this paper, we analyze almost 2,000 Java projects on GitHub to investigate the features and properties of 11 major Java configuration frameworks. We analyze the popularity of the frameworks and try to identify links between the maintenance effort involved with the usage of these frameworks and the frameworks' properties. More basic frameworks turn out to be the most popular, but in half of the cases are complemented by more complex frameworks. Furthermore, younger, more active frameworks with more detailed documentation, support for hierarchical configuration models and/or more data formats seem to require more maintenance by client developers.
配置框架的选择对开发人员重要吗?11个Java配置框架的实证研究
配置框架通常用于软件系统中,以更改应用程序行为而无需重新编译。对于开发人员来说,在大量现有选择中选择合适的配置框架是一个至关重要的决策,因为它会影响项目的可靠性及其维护配置文件。在本文中,我们分析了GitHub上近2000个Java项目,研究了11个主要的Java配置框架的特性和属性。我们分析了框架的受欢迎程度,并试图确定使用这些框架所涉及的维护工作与框架属性之间的联系。更基本的框架是最受欢迎的,但在一半的情况下,有更复杂的框架作为补充。此外,具有更详细文档、支持分层配置模型和/或更多数据格式的更年轻、更活跃的框架似乎需要客户端开发人员进行更多维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信