Perspectives on testing for programming aptitude

ACM '71 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800184.810494
J. M. Wolfe
{"title":"Perspectives on testing for programming aptitude","authors":"J. M. Wolfe","doi":"10.1145/800184.810494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses limitations of programming aptitude tests. The use of multiple-choice type questions, the testwiseness of the college graduate group, and the inclusion of questions of mathematical information tend to diminish the effectiveness of such tests as predictors of success in business programming. Timed tests favor the faster worker over the slower one who is often more accurate and of equal or better logical capability. The usual criterion of a test's validity is itself often not valid as a simulation of the true criterion but is accepted as the equivalent of the criterion because of its measurability and its appearance of plausibility. Comparative results of various occupational groups on the author's Aptitude Assessment Battery: Programming test are analyzed based on the scores of more than 11,000 persons tested, including more than 2,700 persons with work experience in programming in 317 companies, institutions, and government agencies.","PeriodicalId":126192,"journal":{"name":"ACM '71","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '71","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800184.810494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This paper discusses limitations of programming aptitude tests. The use of multiple-choice type questions, the testwiseness of the college graduate group, and the inclusion of questions of mathematical information tend to diminish the effectiveness of such tests as predictors of success in business programming. Timed tests favor the faster worker over the slower one who is often more accurate and of equal or better logical capability. The usual criterion of a test's validity is itself often not valid as a simulation of the true criterion but is accepted as the equivalent of the criterion because of its measurability and its appearance of plausibility. Comparative results of various occupational groups on the author's Aptitude Assessment Battery: Programming test are analyzed based on the scores of more than 11,000 persons tested, including more than 2,700 persons with work experience in programming in 317 companies, institutions, and government agencies.
对编程能力测试的看法
本文讨论了编程能力倾向测试的局限性。选择题的使用,大学毕业生群体的测试性,以及包含数学信息的问题倾向于降低这些测试作为商业编程成功预测因素的有效性。计时测试倾向于速度快的工人,而不是速度慢的工人,后者通常更准确,逻辑能力相同或更好。测试有效性的通常标准本身往往不能作为真实标准的模拟而有效,但由于其可测量性和表面上的合理性而被接受为真实标准的等量物。作者以317家企业、机关、政府机关的2700多名编程工作经验者等11000多人为对象,对“编程能力评估单元”中各职业组的比较结果进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信